Page 2 of 3
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 12:51
by Day
i play both, strongly depends on my mood and the map
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 14:13
by knorke
When I first played Spring, I didnt know about the lobby.
So I played with a friend over lan, using spring.exe.
Because most times the same person would host and the other join I always ended up as Core and he as Arm. (You can't select your side when playing this way)
We argued alot which one was suppossed be the "Herrenrasse"
In EE I usually play GD because airtransports are more fun than climbing mechs.
I usually play the side the other player aint playing. For diversity.
+1
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:01
by Quanto042
I've been playing as arm since i was 15, no reason for me to change now.
<-- 23 now btw
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:10
by FLOZi
USSR
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:20
by Soulless1
In TA I played arm just cos I liked em, and I had a mate who was core-crazy... now in spring (AA) I switched to core because when I started pretty much everyone else played arm cos they were overpowered (I started during the AA 1.42 uberflash days

) and I seem to gravitate away from the easy/popular playstyles for some reason

Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:24
by raneti
i play arm generally because i can fast recognize the build icons, unlike the core wich i played less and have to search for a certain building far longer than i would like; i would appreciate a series of filter hotkeys that would redisplay a certain category of buildings by role like energy, metal, defence, offence
the number of building beeing diferent between the factions and the builders consequently the lvl 1 AA building(defender for arm) will not be in the same place as the core one
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:41
by Lindir The Green
I played CORE because I thought that their OTA units were cooler, and then by habit in spring, and then finally because I became good at CORE but still inexperianced at ARM.
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:53
by Kixxe
CORE.
AK's, PYRO's, dominators, Combat engis k-bot thing, Exploiters.
Tbh i really miss snipers, Mavs, Warriors and penetratos when playing core. Even if penetrators aren't as usefull as they should be :/.
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 19:31
by Sleksa
I started playing ota mainly because of the flashes, and im sure we all know which side has them

Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 21:19
by Hunter0000
CORE, because lasers and flamethrowers are cool =P
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 22:22
by BlackLiger
NOiZE wrote:moved to gamelobby.
Thank you, wasn't sure. Anyway, Arm for me. Core relies on mass assault, Arm relies on stratigic attacking. Nuff said.
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 23:03
by Hellspawn
Arm relies on flashspam and core relies on gatorspam :D.
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 00:59
by BlackLiger
Hellspawn wrote:Arm relies on flashspam and core relies on gatorspam :D.
Not if you agree not to use it. I personally won't use flashspam. Brawler spam, however, is fair game, as a well set up anti air net WILL slaughter brawlers.
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 11:30
by Day
play without flashes and gators? well spam hammers then <_<
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 19:47
by Hellspawn
Day wrote:play without flashes and gators? well spam hammers then <_<
Or Thuds ^_^.
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 22:45
by Lindir The Green
Or spam gators/flashes as usual, for the element of surprise.
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 22:55
by rattle
On Cooper Hill.
Posted: 22 Oct 2006, 00:22
by Day
screw what i said earlier arm > all now <,<
Posted: 22 Oct 2006, 01:22
by Nemo
FLOZi wrote:USSR
You just like them because of the old overpowered DPs
I prefer GBR, myself. Commandos and high quality troops ftw.
Posted: 22 Oct 2006, 09:40
by Hellspawn
Day wrote:screw what i said earlier arm > all now <,<
Yeah flashes are raid0rz and then you get penetrator support and make enemy cry, although I do miss blades sorta =/, those things always worked.