Page 2 of 5
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:03
by Zoombie
Depends on the words.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:04
by Johns_Volition
Zoombie wrote:As the same thing, or what?
yes, the very same thing, although it is less associated with sex, but rather a word of the quality of 'shit' or such. Beside a babelfish is a symbiont that translates and eats brain-waves if I remember correctly.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:05
by Zoombie
I've read the book. And I never got why F@*( was associated with intercourse. And why is F!*( associated with sex, if its a bad thing? Is this a subtle mental cue for use to think sex is bad?
If so thats F(@*ed up.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:09
by Johns_Volition
whateve. Point being that you will find fuck in many languanges:
here some googled examples:
http://www.anarchie.de/main-11563.html
or
http://www.parisbouge.com/soiree.php?id=19835
(I would rate the content if said sites M for Mature audiences only)
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:11
by Johns_Volition
actually, I'm quite sure that the word fuck itself was associated with sex before it also became a swearing word. It might have started as a simpler expression for intercourse, something maybe a commoner would say, but not the nobless. With the end of the strict class system, a lot of these old words simply became deragatory.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:20
by Zoombie
Strange. But mankind is strange, far stranger then fiction.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:54
by Neddie
It all goes back to the development of language by religious insititutions, which the intellectual knows were originally erected to redistribute sexual right.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 07:58
by Johns_Volition
actually, I think it was the 19th and mid 20th century that had the worst influence on sexuel repression in the western world.
mhm
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 19:19
by KDR_11k
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 19:54
by Min3mat
fuck me :O
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 20:05
by FizWizz
in sky

Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 20:31
by Guessmyname
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 21:07
by bamb
I think he meant that why is sex rated for older people than war. And that war is questionable content too.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 21:13
by Johns_Volition
The message and ways of Emmanuel are hard to comprend for lower beings like us,
He, who knows of pain and suffering, understands war peace and defines moral,
He, who speaks only truth.
Emmanuel, is our saviour, and it is at us to deciver his gospel.
Who is with me?
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 23:53
by Min3mat
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 23:57
by Guessmyname
Min3mat wrote:Il, que la baise de la douleur et de la douleur, comprend des singes de guerre et d├â┬®finit amoral, il, qui clavier de v├â┬®rit├â┬® de lawks seulement. Emmanuel, est nos 30, et lui fromage ├â┬á nous au deciver son evangile. Qui est g├â┬óteau je ?
(For those who can't be arsed)
It, that the kisses pain and pain, understands war monkeys and defines amoral, it, that truth keyboard of lawks only. Emmanuel, is our 30, and him cheese to us to the deciver his Gospel. Who is cake I?
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 23:59
by Zoombie
It still makes no sence.
Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 23:59
by Guessmyname
Methinks that's the point
Posted: 26 Jul 2006, 03:02
by Johns_Volition
I think he translated mine via translation machine and then we translated back. Its magic.
Posted: 26 Jul 2006, 06:01
by Das Bruce