Posted: 14 Jun 2006, 23:02
vulcans?CompWiz wrote:you have no idea how much fun flying berthas are...
Spring RTS Engine
Open Source Realtime Strategy Game Engine
https://springrts.com/phpbb/
Wouldn't it be nice if Brawlers carried some sort of anti A?
Page 2 of 3
Posted: 14 Jun 2006, 23:28
We should put Mr. T in as the Core Commander, and Chuck in as Arm.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 00:58
you all understant it's common fare for attack aircraft to have at least 2 air to air missiles? in real life i mean.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 01:34
In REAL life aircraft don't fly sideways.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 02:24
yeah there really isn't a point in aguring what XYZ does in real life in a game with EMG weapons, cloaking, and ... well the entire universe really.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 03:00
The real life argument has no end in sight, or even a point in the first place. (Ever wondered why a nuclear silo with 50 missiles in it's 'clip' explodes with less explosion than 1 nuclear missile? 
)
And BTW if your really concerned about brawlers needing anti-air just add one hawk per five brawlers in the build queue.
)And BTW if your really concerned about brawlers needing anti-air just add one hawk per five brawlers in the build queue.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 03:07
hush hrmph this thread is in offtopic and slight off its rocker to begin with, ur not allowed to inject actual tactical knowledge here. begone 
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 03:07
But then you're missing out on valuable brawler building time... :-/
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 04:54
Acidd_UK is correct, you must not divert any building power away from building Brawlers! hrmph, your solution is infeasible and unacceptable, our only option is to h4x Hurricane-style AA onto the Brawler
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 04:57
no, Hurricanes are weak, or we would build those! we need quinto-octo-deca flak cannons that intsagib all other air!FizWizz wrote:Acidd_UK is correct, you must not divert any building power away from building Brawlers! hrmph, your solution is infeasible and unacceptable, our only option is to h4x Hurricane-style AA onto the Brawler
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 05:08
while we're at it, we can remove the "toairweapon=1;" tag from the flak guns. We won't even need the EMG gun after that.esteroth12 wrote:no, Hurricanes are weak, or we would build those! we need quinto-octo-deca flak cannons that intsagib all other air!FizWizz wrote:Acidd_UK is correct, you must not divert any building power away from building Brawlers! hrmph, your solution is infeasible and unacceptable, our only option is to h4x Hurricane-style AA onto the Brawler
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 06:18
just be sure to make them really expensive so its balanced.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 07:20
Someone make a unit called "Chuck Norris".
-It's a KBot.
-It launches into the air in a spin, and attacks its enemy with an array of: Nukes, plasma shots, big blue lasers of death, and also throws out little Roaches/Invaders that can't be targetted.
-It moves four times as fast as the Jeffy/Weasel
-Shots from any plasma cannon (Bulldodg, Bertha, Buzzsaw, Brawler) instantly destroy the firing unit and all units of the same type, anywhere on the map.
-It bounces said plasma shots off, or absorbs them, either way, gaining 1337k energy.
-It has its own metal an energy storage.
-It can walk on water
-It has flak powerful enough and fast enough to take out a swarm of 2500 enemy planes in 10 seconds.
-Its name is "Chuck Norris"
That's.. a unit that eats bricks and shits gunpowder...
-It's a KBot.
-It launches into the air in a spin, and attacks its enemy with an array of: Nukes, plasma shots, big blue lasers of death, and also throws out little Roaches/Invaders that can't be targetted.
-It moves four times as fast as the Jeffy/Weasel
-Shots from any plasma cannon (Bulldodg, Bertha, Buzzsaw, Brawler) instantly destroy the firing unit and all units of the same type, anywhere on the map.
-It bounces said plasma shots off, or absorbs them, either way, gaining 1337k energy.
-It has its own metal an energy storage.
-It can walk on water
-It has flak powerful enough and fast enough to take out a swarm of 2500 enemy planes in 10 seconds.
-Its name is "Chuck Norris"
That's.. a unit that eats bricks and shits gunpowder...
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 07:22
In the last version of AA I played Hawks can't take care of a swarm, no matter how many there are.hrmph wrote: And BTW if your really concerned about brawlers needing anti-air just add one hawk per five brawlers in the build queue.
It makes me sad because they're my favorite unit.
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 09:47
oh my
can I have a big bertha thing that can only fire at air please?
can I have a big bertha thing that can only fire at air please?
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 15:56
Super Flack gun. Firing nuclear flak shells... :-D Think long range rocket tower for flak...
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 17:20
isn't there already one?
damn what was its name? the avenger? the goliath?
the mercury
...?
T.T
damn what was its name? the avenger? the goliath?
the mercury
...?
T.T
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 18:32
what I want to know is why people think nuclear missiles will explode with a nuclear explosion if they are hit by a shell or blown up with bombs etc..
They dont.. nuclear reactions are difficult to set off and missiles are very stable in that they wont go off unless the warheads are set off in the manner they were designed to do. A nuclear reaction is much more specfic than the chemical reactions used in more "conventional" weaponry. So a stockpile of nukes hit by a bomb will not suddenly go off in a nuclear reaction with the mushroom cloud and the boom..etc.. No they will just destruct the problem is that they will then possibly leak radiactive material into the enviroment, or if the blast hitting them was large enough have said material blown up into the air to cause further problems..
This is also the case with nuclear reactors.. they dont go up like a nuke when they "meltdown" what happens in a melt down is that the seals on the reaction chamber are melted by the extreme heat of the reaction which then causes a leak in radiation.. Nukes unless they are set off corretly largely only leak radiation as a problem..
They dont.. nuclear reactions are difficult to set off and missiles are very stable in that they wont go off unless the warheads are set off in the manner they were designed to do. A nuclear reaction is much more specfic than the chemical reactions used in more "conventional" weaponry. So a stockpile of nukes hit by a bomb will not suddenly go off in a nuclear reaction with the mushroom cloud and the boom..etc.. No they will just destruct the problem is that they will then possibly leak radiactive material into the enviroment, or if the blast hitting them was large enough have said material blown up into the air to cause further problems..
This is also the case with nuclear reactors.. they dont go up like a nuke when they "meltdown" what happens in a melt down is that the seals on the reaction chamber are melted by the extreme heat of the reaction which then causes a leak in radiation.. Nukes unless they are set off corretly largely only leak radiation as a problem..
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 18:59
true, but melting down just isn't cool at all.
And how the hell did this thread get moved out of OT?!
And how the hell did this thread get moved out of OT?!
Posted: 15 Jun 2006, 19:36
i know meltdowns are not cool.. but Im just wondering where people got this whole when nukes are even bumped they go up in a mushroom cloud mentality?