Page 2 of 2

Posted: 17 Nov 2005, 02:33
by Zoombie
I'm not talking about Age of Empires.

IM TALKING ABOUT RISE OF NATIONS!

Posted: 17 Nov 2005, 18:13
by Min3mat
lol
I WAS TALKING ABOUT RoN TOO! sorry i shoulda said that the battles in BOTH AoE AND RoN sucked. sorry (about u playing this crappy games =P)

Posted: 17 Nov 2005, 23:26
by Zoombie
Oh... i'm pretty sure that you said AOE.

TA is way way way better

Posted: 18 Nov 2005, 03:46
by Archangel of Death
[K.B.] Napalm Cobra wrote:The unit limit was too low, plus the mechanics of combat were kinda lame, instant hit cannons, etc.

And arch, I would have a serious sence of forboding about supcom if Chris Taylor led EE2.
Oops, sorry. I meant Rick Goodman, the one that did AOE1 and EE1.

Posted: 18 Nov 2005, 06:22
by [K.B.] Napalm Cobra
I doubt it, but if he did he's certainly lost his touch.

Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 23:18
by el_muchacho
mikedep333 wrote: But since you don't seem to care for details, let's look at the big picture: http://www.metacritic.com/games/platfor ... ofempires3
It has a metacritic score of 81%, much better than the average game. The majority of computer game experts (if there are such a thing) seem to think it's a pretty good game.
I couldn't care less... :roll:
Videogame "critics" = paid fanboys.
AoE3 is just as lame as its predecessors. (okay, the graphics are cool)