Spring RTS Engine

smoth wrote:tried a bit of titans quest today found it dull as hell but maybe just the first hour is like that..

nop, its trufax, i find it pretty fun at the beginning, but at some point you pick different character, then another, trash the game and just forget about it.

rattle wrote:I'm not too keen on TL2, I didn't find that Torchlight entangled me for a long time but I'll prolly grab it anyway due to the low price tag.

Problem with torchlight is that even mario games had bigger level diversity or even better plot... Doesnt matter that much for these kind of games, TL is H&S in its purest form. Still better than diablo and first TL2 screens/pics make very excited.

d3 sux.

blizzard sux until releasing (notfukedup) warcraft 4 (olol right....)

Wombat wrote:

smoth wrote:tried a bit of titans quest today found it dull as hell but maybe just the first hour is like that..

nop, its trufax, i find it pretty fun at the beginning, but at some point you pick different character, then another, trash the game and just forget about it.

rattle wrote:I'm not too keen on TL2, I didn't find that Torchlight entangled me for a long time but I'll prolly grab it anyway due to the low price tag.

Problem with torchlight is that even mario games had bigger level diversity or even better plot... Doesnt matter that much for these kind of games, TL is H&S in its purest form. Still better than diablo and first TL2 screens/pics make very excited.

d3 sux.

blizzard sux until releasing (notfukedup) warcraft 4 (olol right....)

Torchlight 2 has a fair bit of level diversity compared to Torchlight. That being said, they don't have the same color scheme creativity that Diablo 2 has, which isn't speaking very highly of them.

That being said, I'm considering picking up Torchlight 2 on release. I won't be buying Diablo any time soon.

Another major problem with Diablo 3 is that you pay 60 bucks for nothing but a game client allowing you to play the game on their servers.

Yea so for all the people that bought it let's hope they make all the money they're looking for from the Real money action. Then, maybe, the server will still be running in 5 years and people can still legally enjoy a good single player game.

er, battlenet has been online for 12 years now, and i don't know of any old game not working there anymore, so i don't think you should have to worry about diablo 3 being unavailable any time soon

I dont think thats the point. The point is that you are not getting sold an actual game...

rattle wrote:I dont think thats the point. The point is that you are not getting sold an actual game...

I am with this guy

rattle wrote:I dont think thats the point. The point is that you are not getting sold an actual game...

Nope, you are getting a $60 pass to access content indefinitely... imagine if your cable TV provider offered you a deal that good "pay $60 and you will get to watch every episode of the Simpsons on demand for free forever as long as you have an internet connection"

SinbadEV wrote:

rattle wrote:I dont think thats the point. The point is that you are not getting sold an actual game...

Nope, you are getting a $60 pass to access finite content as long as you can connect to their servers

FTFY.

Simpsons has YEARS of episodes.. diablo 3 has very fixed content.

I dont watch TV ;)

Diablo 3 will have pricy addons

yesturday I was playing Diablo, I played 10 mintues, then suddenly finishede like at 4 Hours. This means that in Diablo, if you start playing its hard to stop.With worldwide trendy browser games popular, Chinese games Mythic Saga and Dragon Crusade are all gaining great momentum and even Bigpoint cannot find its previous advantage with its newly released Fantasyrama game.

Office Department C of Blizzard:

TestSubject, would you rather have:
a) the crackpipe (you beeing a addict)
or
b) the diablo 3 (only lended, drugs dont get sold for perma consumption)

The choice is yours...

I think Diablo 3 is just too shallow to keep a playerbase for as long as Blizzard thinks.