Those stats do not include the flash content, which loads
after the Dom ready event. I'm sure we can agree 1.4MB for the whole page video included is paltry and unrealistic.
Also, not all iOS devices can be used as phones, and to iPhones and android devices as 'telephones' is incredibly ignorant.
Possibly because when viewed in landscape the site is squashed into a thin band, with a menu that's unreadable, and dissapears outside the viewport when zooming in (iPhone 4S, iOS 5.0.1):
Or that the page in question with the video looks like this on the same device:
Performance
Having loaded the page in Google Chrome, leaving the window open for 2.5minutes consumned 16MB of video, and counting ( only the flash requests were counted, other content was ignored ). It does not appear to be caching the video.
Assuming that my laptop is tethered to my iPhone, or that my iPhone is loading the video, I have 500mb of 3G allowance per month, which is common here, that gives 6.4MB per minute, or 1 hour and 18 minutes of leaving the page open.
Of note in js.js:
Code: Select all
Uncaught TypeError: Object [object Object] has no method 'prettyPhoto'
initJsSweetnessjs.js:130
$j.browser.versionjs.js:193
f.Callbacks.njquery.js:2
f.Callbacks.o.fireWithjquery.js:2
e.extend.readyjquery.js:2
c.addEventListener.B
Screen Resolutions
Here's the site in 1024x768:
My Work Machine
It's not the fastest of machines but its more capable than a lot of machines out there, and its equivilant to my late 2008 macbook with the same CPU and GPU, only with 4GB not 2GB of RAM (the same macbook on which I did my final year degree project which involved running Spring at 100x speed for 500 rounds).
Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, Geforce 8400m with 128mb dedicated vram, attached to a 23" 1920x1680 monitor.
Maximising the window from 1024x768 to fullscreen on the 1920x168 monitor makes the youtube video lag despite it staying at 480p.
Comparisons to this site
This site is widely acknowledged to be a virtuous fountain of technical bad practices.