Page 2 of 3
Posted: 24 Sep 2005, 23:35
by Dwarden
i use mainly
Maxthon (
http://www.maxthon.com ) that's prolly best IE based one
then if something not works
Mozilla and Firefox
and for compatibility testing
Avant and Netcaptor (IE based)
Opera
and i'm fine :)
Firefox
Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 12:23
by Orbu
Firefox works fine. I'm using it at home under Windows and Linux (same computer - diffrent boot). I'm using at work too. The best part is that I have the same bookmarks (favorites) an all because of one extension that allows me to save them on the external, normal ftp server. This is a very cool feature.
Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 13:24
by FolCan
Firefox FTW
I like Fire fox although occasionly something wont load or something then i have to use IE
I wonder what IE7 is going to be like
Posted: 04 Oct 2005, 05:42
by Lordofinfinity
Well since the majority of the forum likes Firefox I suppose my avatar wont be to offensive to anybody.
I like Firefox, obviously...
Also my school is smart, they use Firefox and not IE.
Posted: 04 Oct 2005, 20:51
by AF
Folcan, astalavista.com, there's a link to an IE7 beta there, or you can go find screenshots on microsoft.com of IE7 on vista. Mind you that site can be troublesome depending on how you use it.
Posted: 05 Oct 2005, 01:41
by SwiftSpear
Ya, IE7. Microsoft is finally deciding to add proper support to png images.
About image interlacing... that is a setting of the acctual image, if you see interlacing you're seeing the image the way the image's author intended it. You might think interlacing is ugly, but it isn't firefoxes fault that they use standard code rather then microcraps style of just pushing out whatever works.
Posted: 06 Oct 2005, 15:00
by aGorm
IE all the way baby...
(This is from someone that does not like microsft and love linux)
Because lets face it... IE does work. Ever been to a site with embeded media on it in Firefox. Its support is rely basic... Netscape atleast half works, but in a Microsoft age, IE does work best.
(PS, of course If in linux obviosly I dont use IE, there is none. But I dont realy use linux that much as everything you buy is for windows... And yes I wish it wasn't this way but it is.)
aGorm
Posted: 06 Oct 2005, 20:27
by AF
Ahem, Netscape 8.x has the option to switch to the IE rendering engine, thus making it better than or as good as IE depending on what you want.
Posted: 06 Oct 2005, 21:19
by SinbadEV
Except Netscape 8 is just plain crap...
Posted: 06 Oct 2005, 21:31
by AF
agreed
Posted: 06 Oct 2005, 23:38
by cain
notice that opera and firefox may identifies themself as IE, and this is the default on opera.
this trick is to allow all the ie only page out of there to work
Posted: 07 Oct 2005, 00:14
by SwiftSpear
aGorm wrote:IE all the way baby...
(This is from someone that does not like microsft and love linux)
Because lets face it... IE does work. Ever been to a site with embeded media on it in Firefox. Its support is rely basic... Netscape atleast half works, but in a Microsoft age, IE does work best.
(PS, of course If in linux obviosly I dont use IE, there is none. But I dont realy use linux that much as everything you buy is for windows... And yes I wish it wasn't this way but it is.)
aGorm
Firefox works fine with imbedded media if you download the drivers... They aren't included by default so 56k users can DL and install the software without it exploding thier modem's. The only reason it works with IE by default is, lets face it, 95% of people only have IE because they installed it with a windows install disk, so microsoft just loaded the whole package on.
I expecially like those pages that upload embedded viruses from IE. Non stadard explorer suite for the win!
Posted: 07 Oct 2005, 11:24
by aGorm
No, honestly... even with the drivers firefox does not actully do what you want it to. It sticks in all the buttons like play and stop (netscape does to, unless you put in two lots of code and detect the brosers to swich between it) when actully u just want it playing by itself. And it does not like you adding your own buttons elsewere, it overides them.
It is fast admitadly... but then the internets so slow do you realy notice??
aGorm
Posted: 07 Oct 2005, 18:54
by hrmph
Firefox > *
I hate IE, talk about a big hole for spyware to crawl through.
Posted: 07 Oct 2005, 19:21
by Min3mat

Firefox >>> Everything!
Posted: 07 Oct 2005, 20:56
by Zenka
I use Opera for a long time.
Everything that is good in Firefox was in Opera long before that.
And since Opera recently became free: Opera > Fire Fox
As for all the IE lovers, sure it runs almost every site, but really, you actually LIKE the browser? You really find it handy, efficient, fast, easy to overlook?
Or are you just to lazy to try something else...
Posted: 07 Oct 2005, 22:39
by FizWizz
I've just made the switch from Opera to Firefox. the reason? Sure, I think that Opera's layout is superior to Firefox's (which is like an IE copy, use Opera and you'll know what I mean), but Firefox makes my modem download files at 5-6 kb/sec instead of Opera and IE's 2.8 kb/sec
Posted: 08 Oct 2005, 15:14
by aGorm
a brouser cant speed up your internet conection... thats just a daft concept. it can reder out a page faster, due to it being better writen and more streamlined, but thats why IE displasyes everything... It slow at rendering but is more genoros on errors and non standered code. Realy... its a poi8ntless argument to tell the truth. (soz... all typed with left hand.... ignore mistakes....)
aGorm
Posted: 08 Oct 2005, 15:50
by GrOuNd_ZeRo
WTF IS FTW???
but i'm giving firefox a chance, even though I don't even remotely trust it...
Posted: 08 Oct 2005, 15:54
by Min3mat
For The Win
eg. Peewees FTW!
