Spring RTS Engine

What are you on about? I wasn't being condecending. I was explaining what I meant. For osme reason reason you got it in your head that when I said repo I was talking about an OS repo or an svn. No that's not what I was tlaking about at all. If you had read the entire post you would realize that. I this particular case I'm talking about a folder on a server.

Forboding Angel wrote:Is there a reason for not making it so that everyone can use it (Not all of us know C# ya know :))?

I find it frustrating that I have to goad people to get answers from them (like in the first post).

Of course C++ programmers all over the world start crying when they see C# because they don't know it. You're so mean Licho. What's your reason?

What's your REASON

Are you going to apologize to Licho for repeatedly claiming that he purposely made the module interface in SD difficult or impossible to use, when the exact opposite is true?

The entire purpose of that was to goad info out of him, seeings that on multiple occasions I asked and got essentially no reply.

SO that's what all you guys are so up in arms about.

I agree that he didn't purposely do it, however, it is Difficult AND Impossible to use for 95% of the modmakers here.

Btw let me point out that I never stated that as a fact (regardless of how you took it). If you read further down in the post I said "Or maybe it just seemed like a good idea at the time".

I will happily apologize to Licho when he apologizes to me for brushing me off every time I asked.

I also find it amusing that 6 of you CA guys have attempted (very badly tbh) to troll me on these forums since I made this topic. I'm fairly sure that Licho is capable of standing on his own two feet.

Regardless, the sooner that .77 comes out, the sooner 1.0 is out and I am gone from here for good (so you're looking at what, a couple months? You'll live). This place is poisonous.

Forboding Angel wrote:The entire purpose of that was to goad info out of him, seeings that on multiple occasions I asked and got essentially no reply.

SO that's what all you guys are so up in arms about.

Please cite other forum posts where you have requested information about SD modules.

Forboding Angel wrote: I agree that he didn't purposely do it, however, it is Difficult AND Impossible to use for 95% of the modmakers here.

Technology is complicated.

Forboding Angel wrote: Btw let me point out that I never stated that as a fact (regardless of how you took it). If you read further down in the post I said "Or maybe it just seemed like a good idea at the time".

Yes, you absolutely did state it as a fact. There were no qualifiers like "maybe" or "perhaps" or "I think".

Either/or Look it up. It's not hard to understand. Words go together to form sentences.

Please cite other forum posts where you have requested information about SD modules.

There is a search button. Use it. I don't think I ever asked on the forums anyway. Maybe I did, can't remember. I ended up giving up a long time ago.

det wrote:Are you going to apologize to Licho for repeatedly claiming that he purposely made the module interface in SD difficult or impossible to use, when the exact opposite is true?

Don't bother trying, really.

det wrote:Are you going to apologize to Licho for repeatedly claiming that he purposely made the module interface in SD difficult or impossible to use, when the exact opposite is true?

I would say that springdownlaoders interface for allowing lobbies to access it is non portable and archane and extremely fiddly at best. Anything with the window registry involved as its API screams 'dont touch me with a barge pole'

Huh? SD communication with lobby is unrelated to module interface.