Page 2 of 3

Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 22:07
by Saktoth
A lot of the questioning of his character is due to some of his behaviour and history, yes. Read the Wikipedia article on him. :D

What swift is objecting to isnt guilt-tripping adverts necessarily (although i suppose one could object to them on all sorts of other grounds), its the guilt-tripping of 'lets help the third world (A misnomer anyway) countries by giving them wikipedia'.

This isnt about rewriting wikipedia articles for third world countries or about paying server costs (so much), this is about 'wikipedia events' and 'wikipedia on cd'.

Wikipedia is a great resource for trivia and general information, but i dont know how much that is going to help global poverty. It is, afterall, just an encyclopaedia.

Wikipedia is not, AFAIK, his full time job (If it were, its an odd job as wikimedia is a not-for-profit organisation). He didnt build it with his bare hands, here. He is no longer chairman of the Wikimedia foundation.

Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 23:08
by LordMatt
AF wrote:Did I mention she's in a wheelchair, has breast cancer, and 9 kids to look after with no childcare money or family?
IMO someone should have tagged her with a norplant or a depo shot after child #1.

Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 23:22
by SwiftSpear
AF wrote:Sadly swiftspear, this definition of scummy means that you've instantly blacklisted thousands of charities across the world, primarily HIV and poverty charities.

He was using the images of 3rd world countries to highlight that change is happenign and si needed and that we can help by rewritting wiki pages in foreign languages. Not that we should donate money to the wikimedia foundation to pay for 3rd world server costs.

In the mean time how is he supposed to pay for all these server bills when wikipedia is his fulltime job?

All of these reactions are over the top and unjustified. Wether you like or dislike the founder of wikipedia is irrelevant. Thats not the point of the video, and to criticize the effort to help people based on an opinion of its founder is disrespectful.

If you spent 40 years peddling orphans into mines, making single mothers slave in 70 hour a week jobs, and swindling OAPs out of their pensions, and had a change of heart, and went good, would you think its fair that people denounce your good cause because of your personal character flaws?
If the money were going towards translating wikipedia into foreign languages or aiding the 100$ laptop project with financial aid and wikipedia disk packages then it'd be a different story. Paying wikipedia server bills doesn't really directly or indirectly help the third world at all. Wikipedia isn't going to go down because jimmy has to pay the bills out of his pocket, the project is worth several million dollars. Effectively it's just pocket change for jimmy, it buys him pizza and beer. LOL, HELP AFRICAN CHILDERN BY DONATING TO THE SWIFTSPEAR FUND!

Realistically... I know it's not all that bad, it's a good non profit project to donate to, but when we look at an HIV research charity and they show us dying people in africa... those people are acctually dying of HIV, and a cost effective cure would help them immensely. No one is dying of lack of wikipedia access, really... it's a nice project, but I'm not even allowed to cite source wikipedia on school papers. I only really use it if I want to learn more about the anatomical structure of the penis, or the band members of apocolyptica, or the third season of MASH. Wikipedia really doesn't have the tools the third world needs to develop, economically or intellectually, and let's be honest with ourselfs... donating to the project isn't going to change that.

Advertizing the wikipedia foundation as a third world charity is just off color. It's not appropriate vs what they are currently advertising are the things the donations are paying for.

Posted: 25 Oct 2007, 07:14
by AF
I personally wouldnt give them money though. I'd rather google or some other company bought them out.

And I use wikipedia all the time for lots of things. I havent looked up any rock bands or genitalia yet though, btu now that you mention it I'll be setting aside the next 10 minutes for wiki browsing.

Posted: 25 Oct 2007, 07:17
by AF
The wikipedia penis page is not particularly entertaining

Posted: 25 Oct 2007, 14:15
by Saktoth
But its informative.

Posted: 25 Oct 2007, 14:17
by smoth
I read wiki A LOT and despite people whining about it's unreliability I have often found the information acceptable.

Posted: 25 Oct 2007, 14:19
by nemppu
SwiftSpear wrote:LOL, HELP AFRICAN CHILDERN BY DONATING TO THE SWIFTSPEAR FUND!.
you shud all don8t to me if any i ned mony to have fod to do troling busines t.t

Posted: 25 Oct 2007, 23:20
by SwiftSpear
AF wrote:The wikipedia penis page is not particularly entertaining
You have to know the scientific names of the individual structure parts. The penis page gets trolled all the time.

Posted: 26 Oct 2007, 20:55
by Neuralize
SwiftSpear wrote:
AF wrote:The wikipedia penis page is not particularly entertaining
You have to know the scientific names of the individual structure parts. The penis page gets trolled all the time.
Epic.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 02:29
by MightySheep
that guy from the video is really sad. why does he keep making strange facial expressions.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 02:31
by AF
Because the auto cue is showing him the wikipedia vagina page.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 02:35
by MightySheep
lols

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 05:42
by Argh
[/rant mode ON]

For the TL:DNR crowd: Um, no offense, but you guys trashing Wikipedia are retards. Tnx, no re, gg.

For people who actually read stuff:

Many more people in developing countries view the Web than you think. They do it in Internet cafes, or through PDAs- if you go look at the markets for wireless devices, you'll understand. Moreover, where the hell do you think all of America's used computers eventually end up? In China, they have a whole industry employing lots of people, tearing apart electronics and often refurbishing them...

Wikipedia is one of the better things on the Internet. It's what the Internet was like when I was slightly older than most of you retards are now- it consisted of patchy access to the Smithsonian, and random FTP servers, BBS's that provided UseNet, and Gopher stuff. You had to be fairly smart to use it, and it was mainly used to move information around, when we weren't trading pirated software (the most ancient of computer crimes, I'm pretty sure).

Then came the first porn sites, and AOL. Good for the growth of the Internet, spur of bandwidth. Ok, so it wasn't all porn and people taking baby-steps with their first PCs, but still... it was an important moment. Because things became less and less about information, and more and more about visuals. It was, to my mind, a huge step in a bad direction, but almost certainly inevitable.

In the process, we've created a monster of a generation, you Gen-Z people, who actually have a FUCKING ACRONYM STATING THAT YOU'RE TOO STUPID, IGNORANT AND INTELLECTUALLY LAZY TO READ THINGS ANY MORE. TL:DNR- it's like a feeling in the Force... millions of minds shriveling from self-induced cavitation...

Hopefully, that is a temporary phenomenon. Or maybe it's just that most people are really just ignorant and lazy, and it's only over the last few years that the process of getting online, and interacting with people like me has gotten easy enough for people like you ;)



I hate to come across as ancient and cranky, but most of you ARE TOO DAMN YOUNG TO REMEMBER WHEN THE INTERNET DID NOT EXIST, and you do not understand what something like Wikipedia means, outside of your privileged, college-bound or in-college little worlds!

If I was living in some backwards hellhole like the Sudan, I'd be teaching myself how to program websites, or something that could be done remotely for First World white-collar retards, like most of you will become someday. And I'd be chuckling, because the $10/hr. you paid would be real money, in Sudan, and would be less like killing, back-breaking labor.

Wikipedia is a godsend to people like me, who hated college but love to learn stuff. I don't have to ask some constipated, arrogant ass of a teacher questions, I don't have to pass exams that have nothing to do with the real world, I don't have to worry about whether the Wikipedia people like my politics. I just go there, and learn things.

It's not a perfect system, but it's frequently better than a Web search, for specific knowledge in a small area of human knowledge, or broad knowledge of a large subject area- I can look up Carthage, for example, and learn about the Carthaginians, and wander the links, and end up learning a lot of history. Moreover, due to the way it works, the history I'm likely to encounter is likely to have been reviewed by multiple "peers", so while it may not be perfect (after all, information there is only as good as the people who post) it's certainly better than nothing.

Ask a bright 11-year-old in America how they'd learn about Carthage. They're going to reply, "I'll look it up on the Internet".

When I was 11, it was, "I will talk to Mommy, and see if I can get her to drive me to a library, and maybe we'll get there before I forgot I was interested in that".

Ask a kid in Egypt. Betcha the answer's the same as the American kid's- however, it costs real money, more than BBS's used to, back when connecting to the Internet was very expensive (they had per-minute charges, to cover long-distance fees, for example... again, you guys make me lol with half-hearted rage, because in half a generation, everybody has forgotten what things were like, before bandwidth was cheap). And, as most intelligent people know, a lot of places like the Middle East, for obvious reasons are a bit... reluctant... to semi-adopt English as their second language of choice.

Therefore, whether or not human knowledge is in a compact, easily-searched destination, and in a culturally-acceptable language, has multiple implications.



It is not an accident that most of our posters are from Europe, mainly Western Europe, New Zealand, and Australia, as well as Canada and the USA... where are all of the smarties from Japan, for example? Please tell me that those guys don't want to make awesome video games, and I'll betcha that there are communities there that are doing some of the same stuff Spring is- but the language barrier is such a problem, we don't talk to them, they don't talk to us, making our collective here weaker than it could be :P

Wikipedia's attempt to address this, by providing translations by human beings, would be extremely useful, especially in the Middle East, where most people do not have access to accurate history about their own countries, let alone the rest of the world. They live in dictatorships of various flavors, they've never experienced our way of life, they're told many lies about us, on a daily basis (please, check out Egyptian TV sometime, if you can find a translation, it's funny stuff)...

And we wonder why they seem to be emotionally retarded and want to kill us. I'd kill us, too, if I was constantly told that everybody in this country was a sexual pervert of some kind, flagrantly wasted money, and was out to get me...



Wikipedia is one of the few things from the First World that is delivered to the rest of the world... that might actually counter that. Instead of showing the worst of the First World (giant bonanzas of porn, violence, and sleazy commercial excess)... it shows us at our best. The First World cultural phenomenon, and the reason why we effectively conquered the world, has more to do with our viewpoint on knowledge than with anything else.

Any asshat can fire a gun. Only an advanced, technically sophisticated society can build a decent army and train it properly.

Any asshat can sell shit on a street corner. Only an advanced, technically sophisticated society can build stock markets and set up rules that allow corporations to thrive without destroying the economy.

Do we want more asshats on Planet Earth, or more people who know that advanced, technically sophisticated societies exist, and came about in large part because of how they integrated new discoveries, increasingly-accurate history, and real science into their worldview? I think that Wikipedia, and other sites like it, are the best propaganda that the First World could ever deliver, because it's so powerful and so insidious. We humans are curious beasts... feed children to the Wiki, and they won't want to become suicide bombers, because they'll know there really are alternative outcomes. And that we here in the First World aren't just horny monsters who want to rape and pillage them.



I don't give a shit about Wales, as a person, and I think his salesmanship sucks. His video was poorly edited, and made his sales points badly- I could've done a better job, filming my own shots, without a script, frankly.

That doesn't actually matter, though.

Wikipedia isn't just a moneyhole for Wales, as any review of their statements as a non-profit will show you (public record, please review before stating stupid stuff). And their actual contribution to the distribution of knowledge is incredible. Whether you wanna look up Carthage or Cartoon Network or Camilla Bowles or even Cavitation is irrelevant... humans finally have a good collective place to store all of the wonderful things they know, in a way that isn't as patchy as personal websites, and provides mechanisms for review. Perfect, no. Better than the library, for all but the most serious study... hell, yes.

This thread is a perfect example of stupid, elitist, mainly white kids making themselves into ignorant asshats. And you're planning to run the world someday :P

[/rant]

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 07:08
by JimmyJ
If the money were going towards translating wikipedia into foreign languages or aiding the 100$ laptop project with financial aid and wikipedia disk packages then it'd be a different story. Paying wikipedia server bills doesn't really directly or indirectly help the third world at all. Wikipedia isn't going to go down because jimmy has to pay the bills out of his pocket, the project is worth several million dollars. Effectively it's just pocket change for jimmy, it buys him pizza and beer. LOL, HELP AFRICAN CHILDERN BY DONATING TO THE SWIFTSPEAR FUND!
I wouldn't spend ALL the money on pizza and beer :?

Really though, I wouldn't donate anything, its just server costs, these 3rd world countries don't usually even have internet access in the first place (if they do its crappy)

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 11:17
by Das Bruce
TL;DNR

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 12:59
by Snipawolf
Nice rant right there :P

I am too young to have known about back then, but the wiki is a wonderful thing. You can find what you want to know, instantly. The only problem is we can't cite the Wiki as a source at my school because "anyone can change it if they want to" and they presume that the page is always messed up... :?

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 14:19
by trepan
Moved to "off topic".

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 14:30
by Sleksa
smoth wrote:Effectively wikipedia is trying to expand into other languages and make themselves more accessible to spread knowledge to the world.

Making a fund raising for this kind of a thing is a noble cause, but wrong method of execution. If you want to give the people in the poor countries a better access to knowledge, you need to raise their country from being a developed country to begin with.

You dont need wikipedia's help in that, you need

1)Stop the usual fighting which is mostly present in the 3:rd world countries, especially africa has had a lot of war in the last few years.
2)start businesses, open up factories and create jobs
3)infrasturcture. roads, hospitals, schools. the very basics, doing this is basically interlinked with 2.


Giving a somali mother of 9 kids a wikipedia packet will make her life no better ~.~

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 15:28
by Forboding Angel
Sleksa wrote:Giving a somali mother of 9 kids a wikipedia packet will make her life no better ~.~
You Make some decent points slek but one comment about this last one... They will be educated, and that is worth a lot.


Argh, I have to agree with your post. In a way it's kind of sad that most people on the internet nowadays don't even know where it originally came from.

If anyone here doesn't understand the significance of DARPA, then you should look it up. It's a very interesting read.