Spring RTS Engine

Boirunner wrote: Keep it Real is just this really crazy obsessed guy that spends hours a day on sass making shit up about sa/lowtax. What he has to say about anything is of no relevance at all.

Not anymore, he was permabanned recently. He spent his time finding the SA bans which were inarguable and posting them as examples of Lowtax's scam.

i got banned from sa forums a couple times

the first was back when registration was free and i just spammed a bunch of crap to get banned for fun

the second was an acct i registered when it was free but by the time i got banned it was pay it was so gay the way i was banned

some fag made some huge ass diatribe thread about how one word replies were the scourge of society.

some admin said he would ban anyone that posted a one word reply to the thread...

so i replied:

"two words"

tombom wrote:

Boirunner wrote: Keep it Real is just this really crazy obsessed guy that spends hours a day on sass making shit up about sa/lowtax. What he has to say about anything is of no relevance at all.

Not anymore, he was permabanned recently. He spent his time finding the SA bans which were inarguable and posting them as examples of Lowtax's scam.

Hahaha, you really have to special to get permabanned from sass. He probably made a website about sass now.

hunterw wrote:"two words"

To be fair, you earned a punishment for that one. On the other hand, a banning is rather harsh.

Boirunner wrote:Hahaha, you really have to special to get permabanned from sass. He probably made a website about sass now.

There's actually an anti-SASS board made as a joke that he started posting on seriously after he was banned complaining about it.

neddiedrow wrote: To be fair, you earned a punishment for that one. On the other hand, a banning is rather harsh.

SA is like that

neddiedrow wrote:

hunterw wrote:"two words"

To be fair, you earned a punishment for that one. On the other hand, a banning is rather harsh.

negative, i completely circumvented the rules that mod gave

if the thread was about replies having no content then i would have deserved it, but it was specifically about one word replies

in conclusion i resent that admin and i hope they drown in urine

tombom wrote:
SA is like that

pff not anymore now what with the probations

Logical extrapolation from the stated rule indicates that what you did would be considered a problem. In addition, expressing disrespect to the administration through challenging their authority in text is in many places a cause for punishment in itself.

This is the internet. The rules are fluid, the worlds are dictatorships, and the magic is without end.

i was simply pointing out the flaw in the original poster's thesis...two word replies can be just as void of content as one word replies

the OP had no complaint about contentless replies, however; his problem was specifically with one word replies. the admin's rule was also specifically for one word replies.

e-penises being brandished wildly is the problem, not my reply