Page 8 of 23
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 18 Aug 2010, 07:45
by REVENGE
1v0ry_k1ng wrote:idra is every kind of a hero
He seems a little pissy, but I guess that's tolerable when you're as good as him.
HuK vs. Silver is a good TvP replay.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 18 Aug 2010, 15:43
by Wombat
idra for mod !
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 18 Aug 2010, 16:29
by JohannesH
REVENGE wrote:1v0ry_k1ng wrote:idra is every kind of a hero
He seems a little pissy, but I guess that's tolerable when you're as good as him.
Well... If he was better still he wouldn't need to rage, but funnier this way
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmes ... c_id=88342
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Aug 2010, 05:25
by REVENGE
JohannesH wrote:REVENGE wrote:1v0ry_k1ng wrote:idra is every kind of a hero
He seems a little pissy, but I guess that's tolerable when you're as good as him.
Well... If he was better still he wouldn't need to rage, but funnier this way
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmes ... c_id=88342
Haha, yeah for our entertainment's sake I guess it's better if he stays this way.

Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 20 Aug 2010, 06:28
by rcdraco
Starcraft 2 be some sort of crapfilled revenue generator designed by the same dicks who created the popular world of warcraft revenue generator. Apparently the guys who coded this took a hint from people I've met and coded something that manages to run worse then every other game I've ever played. Gigabytes of Ram, and my entire video card to run at Max and Spring manages to look better then it?
Not even counting how painfully Zerg/Protoss biased it is. $60 and the game took me 10 hours to complete. Generally speaking I'm the kind of person who should be unable to win a video game like this. I think the easy setting might be a bit too easy. Shift queuing is a nice addition if you wanted to be reminded of everything wrong with current gen RTS's. That and the good units were removed, and the campaign is only Terrans and 3 Protoss missions. Overall I'd say don't waste your money.
And don't respond saying oh fuck draco is back, haha.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 20 Aug 2010, 06:32
by Peet
rcdraco wrote:$60 and the game took me 10 hours to complete. Generally speaking I'm the kind of person who should be unable to win a video game like this. I think the easy setting might be a bit too easy.
This is literally the most retarded argument it's possible to make against a game, but sadly people do so all the time. Play on a higher difficulty if you want a longer playthrough time or more of a challenge.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 20 Aug 2010, 06:38
by Gota
I usually play games on the hardest difficulty but sometimes when i do that i just feel i fill my time up with reloading or replaying the same things many times...im not sure if that is the best way to prolong a campaign.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 20 Aug 2010, 17:07
by 1v0ry_k1ng
the 'Hard' difficulty seems perfect on SC2
if you choose to play through games on the easiest difficulty, you shouldnt be suprised that they are boring and quickly completed. also, you need to man the fuck up
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 21 Aug 2010, 08:13
by REVENGE
Brutal is *plenty* of fun, but there are tedious parts, especially if you want to get achievements. Hard is all the fun, without the drab.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 22 Aug 2010, 06:33
by Sabutai
Somebody ported Speedmetal and called it Nexus War. Played it for hours...
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 22 Aug 2010, 06:50
by Gota
Sabutai wrote:Somebody ported Speedmetal and called it Nexus War. Played it for hours...
Where are the resources located?
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 22 Aug 2010, 06:59
by Sabutai
You get resources every 30 seconds and each kill
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-m7pIJvNL0&feature=fvw bettar video
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 22 Aug 2010, 09:35
by KaiserJ
i played a bit of the campaign earlier today on a nice rig, and i was impressed... pretty cool game, nicely polished, but still very similar to old SC
and wtfzoom

Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Sep 2010, 03:36
by luckywaldo7
Who is that sexy man
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Sep 2010, 09:37
by Wombat
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Sep 2010, 16:50
by Machete234
rcdraco wrote: Gigabytes of Ram, and my entire video card to run at Max and Spring manages to look better then it?
Are you high?
i have everything on recommended (mostly high not ultra) with 3850 card in 1680x1050 with 60fps. (had to uncap it).
And yes it looks better than spring.
rcdraco wrote:Generally speaking I'm the kind of person who should be unable to win a video game like this. I think the easy setting might be a bit too easy.
pfffhh never play a game on easy
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 22:41
by Jazcash
After all the fuss, I only just bought the game today. Never played Starcraft before so I'm hoping to get something new out of it. Still waiting for the updates to download atm but just decided I'd make a post here just to say how *uckin* awesome the GUI graphics are so far. I've only seen the installer and some Battlenet website but holy *hi*.
Seriously I jizzed in my pants.
http://eu.battle.net/en/?-
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/game/
I'm going to need a tissue.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 22:50
by Wombat
u gonna need whole bucket when u see cinematics. and some vaseline. and 3rd hand.
w/e
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 23:13
by SwiftSpear
So many good tournaments. I bought the game, but I've barely played cause I'm too busy watching pro gamers stomp each other.
Starcraft is an awesome game to spectate. It hits most of the things I used to love about spectating Spring games.
Re: Starcraft 2
Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 23:15
by Jazcash
Wombat wrote:u gonna need whole bucket when u see cinematics. and some vaseline. and 3rd hand.
w/e
Just watched the first cutscene. Current status of the bucket = Half full.
Edit: Just loaded up my profile for the first time on the actual application (finally), bits flew around, awesome music blared into my skull, the GUI formed together like some sort of atomic detonation and my brain blew open with excitement.