Spring RTS Engine

smoth wrote:His complaint wasn't that it was unrelated to spring, it was that it didn't suit his preference.

My complaint was not that it did not suit my preference.

Rather that the objectification of women is insulting and offensive, not just to women, and should not be tolerated. If any objectification is to take place it should include both sexes, and if it's a choice between men, women, both, or none, I'd prefer none, followed by both. Seeing men objectified in the same way is cringeworthy, just as a lot of men feel uncomfortable around that kind of stuff, and women have had that for decades now. The whole thing makes a mockery of the valid, hard earnt relationships we have, be that girlfriends/wives, or boyfriends/husbands.

As a straight male however, you're in the category most likely to be oblivious to it, and most shielded from it, and fair enough, even some attractive women who get a lot of 'that' kind of attention are oblivious to it, or are aware but have tolerated it because "thats how society works".

There's an advert I'm fond of that makes the point, with women doing an exercise class in a scenic valley, with a comment on how sexist it is followed by a similar scene of men doing the same thing.


ps: Porn is different. Its expected and the people who go into it know full well that they're going to be objectified, and they're being objectified not because he's a man or she's a woman, and that's how it's meant to be, it's for different reasons entirely. If you don't like it then it's simple, either don't watch porn, or don't take part in producing it.

Object Orientated GenderBendering

I could go and get a soziopathic Macho Interest Avatara so both sides can fight it out. Face it AF, the female of the species have breed man into drug addiction -its all right there in front of you. Every "Oh, soo romantic movie, were the apemale has to jump through the burning hoop" is a loud YES WE WILL.

And they dont tolerate you either. My mum is oh so supportive to organized religion, and the first idea she gets when she meets someone gay "Oh, he would make a excellent monk" - and she always supports/tolerated gay-bashing in private.

So why be there spokesman now? Because there support may be the only thing remaining, once the summer of ressources is over? Oh, great team, that threatens players. I dont invite you either to join the male team. Lets follow the leader, fuck society, just stomp everything into the ground.



Beeing your own team. For sience. Thats what its all about now.

PicassoCT wrote:Sexist homophobic stereotype meh

Me no find funny

imo it looks out of place, like those ad banners alá "hot girls near [your city by IP] looking for a fun time, click here to chat."
It but it seems rather nonprofessional...

[x]videos on autoplay
[x]demo downloads that look like fullversion
[x]cheesy "porn" image
next: pop ups with music?

knorke wrote:imo it looks out of place, like those ad banners alá "hot girls near [your city by IP] looking for a fun time, click here to chat."
It but it seems rather nonprofessional...

[x]videos on autoplay
[x]demo downloads that look like fullversion
[x]cheesy "porn" image
next: pop ups with music?

Videos on autoplay: whats wrong with that? they dont contain music.
Demo downloads that look like fullversion: example?
Cheesy porn image: there is no porn image, only nicely shaped buts

AF wrote:

PicassoCT wrote:Sexist homophobic stereotype meh

Me no find funny

I wonder what you think you can accomplish? Bending reality into something nicer? Would you dare walking out there into the London Riots with a rainbow flag, really putting those assumptions to the test?

I know you hate the guys who burst that nice little bubble. Those who confront me with a facet of reality id like to forget or overcome, they must be ene-mine. Im sorry if you react that way, but i didnt make the ocean who washes your sandcastle away. That ocean was always there. It was just gone for a few hours, while our society acquired enough wealth and luxery to silence the usual tribal mindsets. Look at egypt, look at nearly every country in the world, were that nice colour pales of the wall. Do those people look any diffrent than a hundred years ago? Did all those parades, and t-shirts, all that shouting and marching accomplish anything?


Also, i guess, smoth gets away with it, while i get a hit on the head lesson? At least threat everyone confronting your daydreams equal then!

Videos on autoplay: whats wrong with that?

bandwidth, cpu use (on slower comps)
something better could be in that spot.

Demo downloads that look like fullversion: example?

All the lists/preview things:



And even when clicked it only says:

License Demo / Shareware / Free

so you are still not sure if you are getting a complete game or a demo.

them.Warez. He uses them to attract people to spring. Hurry, tar and feather him for doing something for the comon cause.

Another hint, whatever demo you download.. once you installed it. Its always spring :D

Muhahaha

There are much cleaner, much more efficient ways to achieve whatever it is you're trying to achieve with all these demos.

Reality (and sexism) does not simply "exist" - it is made!

can you add a report button for files that are questionable like:
http://springfiles.com/spring/games/meg ... escalation

AF wrote:

smoth wrote:His complaint wasn't that it was unrelated to spring, it was that it didn't suit his preference.

My complaint was not that it did not suit my preference.

Rather that the objectification of women is insulting and offensive, not just to women

stop right there, I read the rest but I am a feminist. If a person wants to do the sort of thing that these girls do guess what? it isn't objectifying, it is what they want. It is their choice. You see objects, I see someone who enjoys the attention and glamour of that lifestyle. Then again, what would I know? my mom was into all that.

FFS.

For E-quality and to see Smoth raging..

Just because a woman ran down a street with glorious tits and the most perfect vagina arse combination on show in the history of mankind, filmed by hundreds of pixel perfect 4k cameras shouting "OBJECTIFY ME, THE WHORE OF HUMANITY", does not make it okay.

Sure it's well within her rights for her to do such a thing, and it doesn't mean that the videos and images taken of that act are wrong, but that doesn't mean posting the video/image or putting it up is right.

Objectifying someone is wrong. Being objectified however is not the same thing. Imagine if killing a homeless person cured someone of cancer, that does not make curing cancer a bad thing, but curing cancer being a good thing does not make killing a homeless person a good thing too

SHORT HAIR OFFENDS ME! TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN! PEOPLE SHOULD BE FREE TO GROW THEIR HAIR OUT!

smoth wrote:SHORT HAIR OFFENDS ME! TAKE THAT PICTURE DOWN! PEOPLE SHOULD BE FREE TO GROW THEIR HAIR OUT!

Jihadi!!!!

AF wrote:Just because a woman ran down a street with glorious tits and the most perfect vagina arse combination on show in the history of mankind, filmed by hundreds of pixel perfect 4k cameras shouting "OBJECTIFY ME, THE WHORE OF HUMANITY", does not make it okay.

Sure it's well within her rights for her to do such a thing, and it doesn't mean that the videos and images taken of that act are wrong, but that doesn't mean posting the video/image or putting it up is right.

So you are saying that someone posting an image of an alternative lifestyle that others object to is wrong?

PicassoCT wrote:

AF wrote:Objectifying someone is wrong. Being objectified however is not the same thing. Imagine if killing a homeless person cured someone of cancer, that does not make curing cancer a bad thing, but curing cancer being a good thing does not make killing a homeless person a good thing too

objectification happens here:
left Ear thoughts right ear

you cannot control people's thoughts.

That makes no sense. You cant and shouldn't control what people think because something is wrong, else it would be taboo to mention disasters like the holocaust or 9/11, those things that we're supposed to remember?

And no. I'm saying the objectification of women is wrong, and that's what JJs image does, and the point of it. JJ didn't post "here is a photograph of kittens being cared for by nuns but I'm posting it from my phone I hope I got the right image I can't see" nor did he say "Here is an example of orange arses" or "HOLY MOLY I saw this on the way home yesterday o_0", he instead invited us to perv at a row of womens arses and rate them.

and you did, you looked on that guys ass and rated him. Shame on you AF! Inverse Objectification on the beach.

jj wrote:

Senna wrote: Hey JJ did u made a clean up on springfiles?, Talking about full games.

The Moon Project had Small Installation and now its demo why? Pls Answer. Did u had problems with it?

I heard that The Moon Project is a commercial game and it is not permitted to host full commercial games.

I was a little bit angry because you have put SF in a risky position with illegal stuff.

Could you explain why you have uploaded it without doing some research?

The Moon Project is a very old game 11 years old game, so is no longer a commercial game. and you have other full games there too.