Page 6 of 15
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 13:53
by AF
I dont need to, the borg already did it:
Star wars technology just doesn't stand up to star trek technology, mainly because it was never intended to have to deal with the star trek technology at all, which is why Star trek tech pawns star wars, however most star trek ships would crumble once their shields are disabled, and most star trek races cant handle optics based weapons either. Which is why the borg will always come out on top. However every other star trek race would be defeated by the empire save possibly the krenem who would just use their temporal tech to make the imperial empire cease to exist.
So Star wars fleet > Star trek fleet if star trek fleet != borg/krenem. It could also be argued that species 8472 might count but nobody knows enough. And the Q don't use ships so they don't count either.
On a side note you could include replicators perfectly fine, even if a replicator ships was annihilated, its wreckage would be an even bigger threat.
toto and auntie M are turned into cabbages by the retardedness of mr.blobby:

Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 14:36
by bwansy
I thought Masse had successfully diverted this idiotic Wars VS Trek flame war back to a more interesting picture fight, but here he's back again...
Sci-fi's can't be compared. The settings are different, the technonogies are different. SW technology is not intended to deal with ST, but neither is ST intended to deal with SW. Please don't take it so seriousely, AF. I know you love ST, but I also know that none of the producers on either side would love to see this lunatic debate war.
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 14:52
by AF
I already made that point,
AF wrote:Star wars technology just doesn't stand up to star trek technology, mainly because it was never intended to have to deal with the star trek technology at all,
I even then redirected using mr blobby to pwn neuralize.
I'm starting to think turning toto into a cabbage was a bad idea and I should have sent in something borg to give you a big ego boost. Perhaps something far deadlier would suffice
David Dickinson takes the regurgitating bwansy and shoves an antique vase down his throat then smashes it sending bits of flesh covered vase everywhere before saying it was "cheap as chips!" and announcing team red was the winner for finding such a corny find.
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:06
by SwiftSpear
Star wars and star trek universes are so different, Star wars universe is much smaller and it is almost technologically stalled with a social climate almost at the point of the pirate era of the early western continent discovery. Star trek technology is vastly superior and less stalled, the social climate is also significantly different, much closer to todays social climate.
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:11
by Fanger
FOR FUCKS SAKE... STOP ARGUING ABOUT STAR TREK VS STAR WARS.. this is a picture fight, not a retarded tech discussion..
Star trek is not more advanced, its MORE retarded, actually they are both retarded...
If the lot of your would reroute the power out of the nerd parts of your brains and come back to reality youd realize this.. and AF if you dont stop with this stupid borg thing, im gonna have to pull out some nasty stuff..
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:11
by Zoombie
And Warhammer 40,000 can still beat both of them at the same time.
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:12
by Fanger
NOOOOOOOOO!
Dont bring that into this.. For the love of god, NOOOOO!
aww crap, Swift lock this thread, well have to start a new one now...
Awesome zoombie, way to use your head.. good show man good show...
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:17
by Zoombie
Sorry...I coulden't help it.
Well the picture fight was fine untill the borg got into it. I personally was thinking more of robocob and termincator, but thats just me.
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:20
by Fanger
It has to do with the retarded nature of the borg, they were designed to be a unbeatable persistant enemy for the TNG, and so they end up thwarting most attempts to reason past them, due to their massive plot armor of shield modulation.. which honestly doesnt make sense but meh..
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:37
by Zoombie
Do sheilds even do anything against things like...nukes and guns? Its not very clear. Oh thats because it's the USS Make-shit-up.

Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 15:44
by rattle

Beats long speeches.
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 16:34
by Day
this thread shouldv ended with chuck norris ^^
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 17:33
by AF
Actually it depends what type of shielding for which there are thousands of different explanations across the scifi world for a miriad of shield techs and how they work and what they deflect.
But really fang, I did drop the borg, I posted a picture of mr blobby and david dickinson ffs but people keep trying to pull it back to the borg.
And swiftspear was right about ST and SW techs, SW tech only started to move forward again after the clone wars started and the seperatists started work on the great weapon (ironically it came before the deathstar and if it were completed would have the power to blow up planets).
To disperse this sniping and constant attempts to resurrect the borg, AF summons the spanish inquisition to root out the trolls!

Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 17:58
by bwansy

Yeah. Enough technobabble. Let's travel back in time!
Some research states that T-Rex's maybe scavengers, but meh, don't you think it can still bite a human in half?
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 18:16
by Foxomaniac
T-rex gets pwnt by a certain someone!
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 18:21
by Zoombie
HA!
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 18:33
by Foxomaniac
Durr!
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 18:37
by Zoombie
Take that road!
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 18:44
by Foxomaniac
Psst, just take a diffrent route!
Posted: 09 Nov 2006, 19:27
by Zoombie
Dragon...teethed!