My 2 cents
Posted: 09 Jun 2006, 15:21
Hey all.
Thought it was about time i tried to put down some thoughts on EE.
I know i dont know the game inside out like some of you guys and im probably missing the point of alot of stuff but still i have been playing RTS games for 10 years or more so that must count for something heh.
I have found it very hard to make choices of which unit to build, firstly because there is no manual that i know of listing the costs, ranges damages etc of the units, and i also dont know how the combat system is worked out, migitation etc so i dont know which weapons are good vs which targets etc.
There is alot of talk about counters and while there should obviously be counters, as you would make weapons for various tasks i get the feeling that there is something of a paper rock scissors thing going on and i really dont think that should be the case in a game with real world physics, for more information on this point read this link regarding SupCom = http://uk.pc.gamespy.com/pc/supreme-com ... 026p4.html
Basically things like aircraft should be small and fast moving so that a tank firing a cannon shell is going to miss, its not that the cannon cant fire at it or that it doesnt do any damge when it hits, it simply cant hit the target. perhaps it doesnt even have a fire arc on it. conversely the aircraft firing crappy little machine guns that are good vs weak armour air targets can hit the tank all day long, but it would need to if it wanted to have any chance of damaging it before the player died of old age. Machine guns simply wont penetrate the armour on the tank.
Getting back to not being able to choose which units to use.
All the level 1 URC units cost basically the same amount, take the same time to build, look the same, move at the same rate etc and have pretty similar hps. While there are units with roles i find that they are mostly incapable of performing their task. Artillery at level 1 is too short in range to be worthwhile, flamers have too little hps to get in close, rockets and plasma are far too similar and SAM's are pointless as virtually anything can take out an air target so why build a specific AA unit which cant do anything but fire vs air?
imo the flamers should be THE assault unit of choice they should be slow, hard hitting, close range and heavy on armour.
Plasmas should be the the general purpose unit, 'ship of the line' grunt, dogs body, whatever you wanna call it.
Rockets should have a range increase and serve as fire support / AA
Artillery should have a substantial range buff, its artillery thats what artillery is. LONG LONG range totally inaccurate indirect / blind firing basically pound the shit of of that stuff way over yonder.
These range changes would allow you to have flamers at the front, then plasma, then rockets, then arty. all firing at the same point.
Rather than having tech levels unlock things like assault vehicles (L3 ground) and artillery (L2 / L3 arty) each tech level would simply give you a better version, it would generally be better, harder, more cost effective etc. but retain the speeds as that is key to retaining low tech usefulness as you progress through the tech tree.
There should be about 6 types of aircraft :
transports and radar / scouts
Gunships these should be weak on hps, fast compared to ground units but not compared to air units, HARD hitting, strafe attack style.
AA, these take out bombers and gunships and are hard to hit with non AA weapons such as cannons etc. weak generally, fast, spamable.
AAA these take out the AA ships, even weaker and more spamable good for FA aside for taking out AA craft
Bombers, slow, heavy armour, hard hitting capable of bypassing nme lines and deep striking bases which to not have substantial AA / control of own airspace.
Could maybe have air work a bit different to ground in that not all would be available right at the start (tech 1)
perhaps something like
Tech 1 = Gunships and AA
Tech 2 = Better Gunships and AA + Transport and Radar
Tech 3 = Even better Gunships / AA / Transport / Radar (maybe stealth aspects to the transport and radar rather than properties like hps etc) and the introduction of the AAA and Bombers.
This would give you more tactical options with the introduction of tech level 2 and at level 3 would give you deep striking capabilties and also an advantage in the air sup battle.
I was also thinking that you could have more buildings, rather than having the vehicle plant make everything you could have 1 building for civilian type constructions, scouts, transports, mine layers, builders, radar and anti radar etc
Another building for general battle units and then a 3rd for racial specials such as stealth versions of battle units / civ units (where appropriate)
I realise that you dont want porcing to be easy, i dont want that either, but i think atm that defences are too weak, to the point where they arent worth buidling. (Least thats what i get told.. build units not defences, dont porc etc, if i shouldnt porc then why are there even defence units in the game??)
I kinda think that porcing should be at least semi viable for all races and also that the map choice should not dictate the team you use. atm on a flat map its best to GD, if you dont you lose, on hilly you go URC and shrug i dunno, maybe water would be NI i dunno i havent seen NI yet.
Possible fix for that would be URC units that are good on an open field, but the URC should not be as efficent at building this unit type as the GD, and so on.
Also the racial metal extractors are only applicable to tech level 1 and the commander cant build them which i dont much like, the fact that the commander cant build the stealth mex makes you want to not build any with him and wait until you can build a stealth version. And the fact that the stealth doesnt carry through the tech levels just kinda doesnt make any sense.
Ok thats about all i got atm, hope i havent ruffled too many feathers
Obviously its your mod Fang and you are going to make it as you see fit, just giving you another perspective to help you to deside what is best in your opinion from an informed position.
Look forward to playing with you all again soon,
Takecare all,
Guffrus
Thought it was about time i tried to put down some thoughts on EE.
I know i dont know the game inside out like some of you guys and im probably missing the point of alot of stuff but still i have been playing RTS games for 10 years or more so that must count for something heh.
I have found it very hard to make choices of which unit to build, firstly because there is no manual that i know of listing the costs, ranges damages etc of the units, and i also dont know how the combat system is worked out, migitation etc so i dont know which weapons are good vs which targets etc.
There is alot of talk about counters and while there should obviously be counters, as you would make weapons for various tasks i get the feeling that there is something of a paper rock scissors thing going on and i really dont think that should be the case in a game with real world physics, for more information on this point read this link regarding SupCom = http://uk.pc.gamespy.com/pc/supreme-com ... 026p4.html
Basically things like aircraft should be small and fast moving so that a tank firing a cannon shell is going to miss, its not that the cannon cant fire at it or that it doesnt do any damge when it hits, it simply cant hit the target. perhaps it doesnt even have a fire arc on it. conversely the aircraft firing crappy little machine guns that are good vs weak armour air targets can hit the tank all day long, but it would need to if it wanted to have any chance of damaging it before the player died of old age. Machine guns simply wont penetrate the armour on the tank.
Getting back to not being able to choose which units to use.
All the level 1 URC units cost basically the same amount, take the same time to build, look the same, move at the same rate etc and have pretty similar hps. While there are units with roles i find that they are mostly incapable of performing their task. Artillery at level 1 is too short in range to be worthwhile, flamers have too little hps to get in close, rockets and plasma are far too similar and SAM's are pointless as virtually anything can take out an air target so why build a specific AA unit which cant do anything but fire vs air?
imo the flamers should be THE assault unit of choice they should be slow, hard hitting, close range and heavy on armour.
Plasmas should be the the general purpose unit, 'ship of the line' grunt, dogs body, whatever you wanna call it.
Rockets should have a range increase and serve as fire support / AA
Artillery should have a substantial range buff, its artillery thats what artillery is. LONG LONG range totally inaccurate indirect / blind firing basically pound the shit of of that stuff way over yonder.
These range changes would allow you to have flamers at the front, then plasma, then rockets, then arty. all firing at the same point.
Rather than having tech levels unlock things like assault vehicles (L3 ground) and artillery (L2 / L3 arty) each tech level would simply give you a better version, it would generally be better, harder, more cost effective etc. but retain the speeds as that is key to retaining low tech usefulness as you progress through the tech tree.
There should be about 6 types of aircraft :
transports and radar / scouts
Gunships these should be weak on hps, fast compared to ground units but not compared to air units, HARD hitting, strafe attack style.
AA, these take out bombers and gunships and are hard to hit with non AA weapons such as cannons etc. weak generally, fast, spamable.
AAA these take out the AA ships, even weaker and more spamable good for FA aside for taking out AA craft
Bombers, slow, heavy armour, hard hitting capable of bypassing nme lines and deep striking bases which to not have substantial AA / control of own airspace.
Could maybe have air work a bit different to ground in that not all would be available right at the start (tech 1)
perhaps something like
Tech 1 = Gunships and AA
Tech 2 = Better Gunships and AA + Transport and Radar
Tech 3 = Even better Gunships / AA / Transport / Radar (maybe stealth aspects to the transport and radar rather than properties like hps etc) and the introduction of the AAA and Bombers.
This would give you more tactical options with the introduction of tech level 2 and at level 3 would give you deep striking capabilties and also an advantage in the air sup battle.
I was also thinking that you could have more buildings, rather than having the vehicle plant make everything you could have 1 building for civilian type constructions, scouts, transports, mine layers, builders, radar and anti radar etc
Another building for general battle units and then a 3rd for racial specials such as stealth versions of battle units / civ units (where appropriate)
I realise that you dont want porcing to be easy, i dont want that either, but i think atm that defences are too weak, to the point where they arent worth buidling. (Least thats what i get told.. build units not defences, dont porc etc, if i shouldnt porc then why are there even defence units in the game??)
I kinda think that porcing should be at least semi viable for all races and also that the map choice should not dictate the team you use. atm on a flat map its best to GD, if you dont you lose, on hilly you go URC and shrug i dunno, maybe water would be NI i dunno i havent seen NI yet.
Possible fix for that would be URC units that are good on an open field, but the URC should not be as efficent at building this unit type as the GD, and so on.
Also the racial metal extractors are only applicable to tech level 1 and the commander cant build them which i dont much like, the fact that the commander cant build the stealth mex makes you want to not build any with him and wait until you can build a stealth version. And the fact that the stealth doesnt carry through the tech levels just kinda doesnt make any sense.
Ok thats about all i got atm, hope i havent ruffled too many feathers
Obviously its your mod Fang and you are going to make it as you see fit, just giving you another perspective to help you to deside what is best in your opinion from an informed position.
Look forward to playing with you all again soon,
Takecare all,
Guffrus