Spring RTS Engine

TheFatController wrote:Oh yes the kbot builder being weak completely refutes his previous good feedback.

If only it had jumpjets and a gravity cannon and emp and a widget that flashed up a giant animated console when you hovered over it noone would notice it's flaws

Oh don't get me wrong this mod is completely great like he said.

But it's not great because you don't change things - it's great because you fix things with small, incremental patches.

TheFatController wrote:CA lol

Lets be civil now.

hoijui wrote:ARMs torpedo bombers

This is something only Torpedo Bombers do. They also attack hovercraft (no other torpedo does). Both issues can be fixed by an ONLYTARGET:WATER category. However, BA has no consistent 'water' category that can use this. BA's categories could do with a look at in general in that regard, they are OTA leftovers and kind of erratic. The other problem is amphs will have to be included, so torpedo bombers will be usable against these units when they're on land.

In CA, the torpedoes bounce off the ground instead of sinking in shallows and coasts (depthcharges do the same thing, so you can put them in shallows and swamps etc). This also means they bounce on the ground and can actually be used against land targets if the land is flat. We havent bothered fixing it either (especially because they actually hit, so you can actually use them).

Could i change all builders terraformspeed ? its annoyingly slow... and wouldnt change the game tactics really if its changed like 3 times faster.

TradeMark wrote:Could i change all builders terraformspeed ? its annoyingly slow... and wouldnt change the game tactics really if its changed like 3 times faster.

This. Terraforming sucks.

Oh yeah decoy commanders are too expensive...except maybe in Comm Ends games.

Would it be appropriate to have them cost much less in killall games, somewhat less in team comm ends, and full price in commander ends games?

YokoZar wrote:Oh yeah decoy commanders are too expensive...except maybe in Comm Ends games.

they dont really have a purpose in non-comends games and the price changes would be confusing for ppl.

BaNa wrote:

YokoZar wrote:Oh yeah decoy commanders are too expensive...except maybe in Comm Ends games.

they dont really have a purpose in non-comends games and the price changes would be confusing for ppl.

They have a very nice purpose - they attract bombers and other fire

YokoZar wrote:

BaNa wrote:

YokoZar wrote:Oh yeah decoy commanders are too expensive...except maybe in Comm Ends games.

they dont really have a purpose in non-comends games and the price changes would be confusing for ppl.

They have a very nice purpose - they attract bombers and other fire

Try loading one in a atlas and flying it over a enemy commander sometime ~~

Well, if you think of games where people are spamming t2 units a decoy commander isn't a huge investment in the scheme of things, if anything its high cost makes it more of an effective decoy - if it was cheap then decoys would be everywhere and noone would bother specifically targeting commanders.

you lot have not seen spam...

Sleksa wrote:
Try loading one in a atlas and flying it over a enemy commander sometime ~~

step 1: fly decoy comm over enemy boy
step 2: ???
step 3: profit

hunterw wrote:

Sleksa wrote:
Try loading one in a atlas and flying it over a enemy commander sometime ~~

step 1: fly decoy comm over enemy boy
step 2: ???
step 3: profit

haha good idea XD i will do that some time... they would get panic XDD then i attack in their weak places while they try to run with com XD