Does AA need a level 2 anti air kbot?

LOrDo · Post by **LOrDo** » 12 Jul 2006, 10:21

Ive seen alot of diffrent answers for this, so I decided to make a poll. I think its needed badly, lvl 2 is just whipps armys because of no aa to counter them.

Cheesecan · Post by **Cheesecan** » 12 Jul 2006, 10:22

Lolsquad_Steven · Post by **Lolsquad_Steven** » 12 Jul 2006, 10:25

There's already enough AA, build fighters.

Gluemeon · Post by **Gluemeon** » 12 Jul 2006, 10:31

No, I don't believe so at all. Agreeing with what Steven had to say, there's already an abundance of AA in the game. Use fighters, large amount of lvl 1 AA Kbots, or borrow some from a teammate using vehicles. If you have a level 2 kbot army anyway, it shouldn't hurt you too much economically to provide some fighter cover.

clericvash · Post by **clericvash** » 12 Jul 2006, 10:33

There has been many times i went to build one, and "oh shit there isn't"

It would be might useful!

Nightstorm71 · Post by **Nightstorm71** » 12 Jul 2006, 10:48

IMHO this could be more efective, thann building masses of stationarie AA.
Makes it more strategic.

ginekolog · Post by **ginekolog** » 12 Jul 2006, 11:14

i say no because kbots rule even without AA. With AA ppl might never go veh again.

Machiosabre · Post by **Machiosabre** » 12 Jul 2006, 12:42

I do think kbots already have an edge on vehicles, but there is a place for lvl2 aa kbots, or atleast some changes to mobile aa, because right now mobile aa's alright but it just isn't very advanced it's just lvl1 and early lvl2 stuff.

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 12 Jul 2006, 12:58

Penetrators anyone? :)

Would be nice to see a kbot with the anti bomber missile.

Min3mat · Post by **Min3mat** » 12 Jul 2006, 15:43

Penetrators anyone? :)

ROFLMAO
got to love the noobs

Erom · Post by **Erom** » 12 Jul 2006, 15:49

I don't think it NEEDS a L2 AA Kbot, but I think it would be fun and convenient to have one.

Plus give you an alternative to flack for mobile AA, not that this is strictly necessary since you can get missile by bringing along some fighter cover.

Cheesecan · Post by **Cheesecan** » 12 Jul 2006, 16:06

Okay here's an observation; mainly noobs want lvl2 kbot aa.

Elmokki · Post by **Elmokki** » 12 Jul 2006, 16:11

ginekolog wrote:i say no because kbots rule even without AA. With AA ppl might never go veh again.

This is the main reason I'm concerned about too.

Comp1337 · Post by **Comp1337** » 12 Jul 2006, 16:18

Hell, bring them on imo
I dont generally build mobile flakkers anyway, i jsut get fighters.

MR.D · Post by **MR.D** » 12 Jul 2006, 17:07

Kbot LVL2 deserves to have an antiair unit, if its equal or slightly better than a Jethro class AA unit thats fair.

Its been an empty hole thats needed filling since TA+CC was made.

We don't need a Uber flak/missle platform for it to be valuable, just something as effective as the LVL2 vehicle flakkers.

Min3mat · Post by **Min3mat** » 12 Jul 2006, 17:40

equal to the Jethro...so you'd waste your T2 plants building time on a Jethro instead of getting it in the T1 fac?
Caydr's plans were to make it a support weapon which is failry effective but not as effective as the mobile flak truck

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 12 Jul 2006, 18:02

IMO kbots don't need a AA bot... vehicles are underused already!

Lolsquad_Steven · Post by **Lolsquad_Steven** » 12 Jul 2006, 18:38

lvl1 kbot lab needs a crab Kbot that walks on its side and fires nukes too plz.

Machiosabre · Post by **Machiosabre** » 12 Jul 2006, 21:02

Lolsquad_Steven wrote:lvl1 kbot lab needs a crab Kbot that walks on its side and fires nukes too plz.

that joke totally doesn't work for this topic.

Ishach · Post by **Ishach** » 12 Jul 2006, 21:18

Machiosabre wrote:
Lolsquad_Steven wrote:lvl1 kbot lab needs a crab Kbot that walks on its side and fires nukes too plz.
that joke totally doesn't work for this topic.

trust me, it does

Spring RTS Engine