Actually...Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPE2CnTh ... re=recentf
This might change your mind.
Moderator: Moderators
Actually...Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?
Its given birth by chance, if you throw some eggs, some milk, flour and sugar into the air, and do so for a billion, gagillion, fafillion, shabolubalu million illion yillion times, you actually get three delicious cakes, who are moist, and reproduce moar cake.Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?
It happened on the 20th May, 2010. Google it (and anyone else who is interested)Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?
You don't know very much about Christianity do you? I assuming that you only know that they go around and "blowing up" stuff, and other hateful stuff that your brethren teaches you.zwzsg wrote:No, he was man. Making himself worshipped as a god is called idolatry, and the Bible itself says that is punishable by death. If the Bible says Jesus Christ is guilty, then it is just like as if God says Jesus Christ is guilty, for the Bible is nothing but the words of God. Who are you to contest the law of God?
1.No true Scotsman.PicassoCT wrote:Best thing is wikipedia is on our side
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquistador
There is more, and the same goes for other religion. And yes, those are true believers, after all they just dont take one or two sentences out of context by there own choice&tradition, instead keep the whole 99.9% of bloody murderous preaching in good faith. The problem is not taking there arguments apart, even in middair, it is that you archieve nothing by that work, thats why people dont back it up. Believers dont read footnotes, hell they dont even read there own book.
And now for the positiv side of the whole thing. After the pill has hit the demographics of most of the western societys, it are bubbles of religious fanatics who provide from the inside (US-Version)- or refugeestreams from the outside (European-Experiment) new fuel for the enlightning engine. So this seemingly useless thread, has a purpose at last.
I think you confused yourself there.Super Mario wrote:Amazing that the famous troll got you all into a flame war. I also find it amazing that the militant atheists are arguing that a certain guy wrote a book that they don't even believe existence in the first. Hypocritical or ironic? I never know.
Should someone who "knows about christianity" follow the teachings of christianity? Why should we ignore god's words in the old testament? At the very least it shows god's fallibility that he had to rewrite his own rules. Then he rewrote them again in the Koran... no wait.Super Mario wrote:You don't know very much about Christianity do you? I assuming that you only know that they go around and "blowing up" stuff, and other hateful stuff that your brethren teaches you.zwzsg wrote:No, he was man. Making himself worshipped as a god is called idolatry, and the Bible itself says that is punishable by death. If the Bible says Jesus Christ is guilty, then it is just like as if God says Jesus Christ is guilty, for the Bible is nothing but the words of God. Who are you to contest the law of God?
Otherside wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJRxsnwQww
watch this part of the richard dawkins documentary.
I want to punch that stupid evangelical retard in the face.
"The bible dusnt contradict itself" i lold hard then he started raging cos he knew richard dawkins was going to own him hard.
Some woman going on about how not all people's DNA is a double helix, that some people have 4 triangles of DNA pointing inwards.Otherside wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJRxsnwQww
Yeah amazing isn't it. So let me get this correct, based on science we can create all these wonderful tools like computers and stuff, but it can't prove or disprove Ukko Ylijumala (ancient god worshipped in finland before christianity spread, known as Thor in scandinavia). Ukko Ylijumala clearly said in folklore he created rain and we can certainly see rain happening every now and then, so science must be wrong! Checkmate atheists.It's amazing how science can cure diseases, smash the atom and create nuclear explosions, yet be so wrong about everything that is mentioned in the Holy Bible