spring for android?
Moderator: Moderators
Re: spring for android?
also, afaik, you can only make android apps in Java. Google might have changed this by now, i haven't really been paying attention, but if not, it sounds like a pretty big problem xD.
not that i think the idea is feasible right now
not that i think the idea is feasible right now
Re: spring for android?
android has an option to compile native code for performance iirc
-
- Posts: 834
- Joined: 19 May 2009, 21:10
Re: spring for android?
Moore's Law is about number of transistors. They are still increasing.Pxtl wrote:To me it seems like Moore's Law is grinding to a halt.
Re: spring for android?
I have a couple of phones (im a HTC fanatic) and pdas sitting around, but the best thing I have is something some crazy chinese kid did to a touch involving the dual snapdragon config that htc keeps mentioning. Battery life is a bit bad, but with an extended battery and a thicker cover, and a piece of black duct tape to hold it all together, its pretty sick. Hardly a phone anymore lolz.
Anyway I have gotten ubuntu running on it, missing a few features such as bluetooth and gps.
Anyway I have gotten ubuntu running on it, missing a few features such as bluetooth and gps.
Re: spring for android?
Guys, I only came here to ask cause I had warcraft 2(wargus) and starcraft on my htc 6800(playable install). Since I have the moto droid now I wanted to see if there was a better rts for the droid.
Sry the folks here have no intrist in a project like this. But I was not troling.
I guess ill poke around on irc to see if any one wants to join a project for an online rts for the android platform.
And if this thread started that much trouble then please delete/remove/purge it
Best regateds
Sry the folks here have no intrist in a project like this. But I was not troling.
I guess ill poke around on irc to see if any one wants to join a project for an online rts for the android platform.
And if this thread started that much trouble then please delete/remove/purge it
Best regateds
Re: spring for android?
Sorry, it's just that every other month somebody says "hay guise you know wat would be awesome if ba was on the psp and it cud play starcraft 2 cuz my mom wnot by it 4 me k thx when will it be rdy"
and we get a little cranky about that.
and we get a little cranky about that.
Re: spring for android?
It isn't a problem, elio, it is simply something beyond present capabilities.
Re: spring for android?
In a few years' time, Spring on a handheld device like an Android phone isn't at all out of the question really. I'm more confused by how you'd control the game and fit all the interface (etc) onscreen.
IMO there will probably soon (2-3 years) be x86 chips suitable for ultra-mobile device use and probably just as fast as an entry-level desktop PC. Better to just wait for the technology to come to us, rather than try to encourage the waste of precious developer-hours for something that would likely be useful to only a few people.
IMO there will probably soon (2-3 years) be x86 chips suitable for ultra-mobile device use and probably just as fast as an entry-level desktop PC. Better to just wait for the technology to come to us, rather than try to encourage the waste of precious developer-hours for something that would likely be useful to only a few people.
Re: spring for android?
I'm using the 1005HA EeePC which I thought was a fairly newish model. But apparently I can't even start Spring cause my gfx card is so bad?Neddie wrote:The problem, though, is reducing the CPU footprint. As bad as the integrated graphics are, they are not what prevents me from 1v1 on my EEE.Jazcash wrote:I'd prefer to get a version of Spring running my netbook. Just a trimmed down graphical version of Spring which is compatible with online gameplay...
Re: spring for android?
I'm on a 1000HE and can start Spring on very low settings but cannot play or spectate for more than a few minutes without massive slowdown due to complete CPU choke. Yes, our integrated graphics are miserable, but the heavy CPU load is what really damns the hardware.Jazcash wrote:I'm using the 1005HA EeePC which I thought was a fairly newish model. But apparently I can't even start Spring cause my gfx card is so bad?Neddie wrote:The problem, though, is reducing the CPU footprint. As bad as the integrated graphics are, they are not what prevents me from 1v1 on my EEE.Jazcash wrote:I'd prefer to get a version of Spring running my netbook. Just a trimmed down graphical version of Spring which is compatible with online gameplay...
Re: spring for android?
I can run Quake3 at good 25 fps on Nexus One.
Re: spring for android?
Yeh I had Quake Live running alright on my netbook the other day. Was getting 50 FPS or so but now for some reason it's dropped down to about 20 ¬_¬==Troy== wrote:I can run Quake3 at good 25 fps on Nexus One.
Re: spring for android?
Jazcash wrote:Yeh I had Quake Live running alright on my netbook the other day. Was getting 50 FPS or so but now for some reason it's dropped down to about 20 ¬_¬==Troy== wrote:I can run Quake3 at good 25 fps on Nexus One.
windows?
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: spring for android?
You have a Nexus One?==Troy== wrote:I can run Quake3 at good 25 fps on Nexus One.
./jealousy
Re: spring for android?
I'd think for iPad sized devices spring would be fine given some time and effort streamlining the codebase and revamping the GUI
Re: spring for android?
Atom's a complete crock of shite though. It's designed to be cheap to manufacture above all else. Once we're down to 32/28 nm and smaller in common chips (65/45/40 are all common right now), AMD and Intel are both planning on ultra-low-voltage chips that actually have some number crunching power.
After all, 1.6 ghz Atom CPUs were found to be on par or worse than 900 mhz Celeron CPUs in most situations back when netbooks were the latest thing. The only thing that keeps Atoms in use is the fact that they cost practically nothing.
There will be a huge upset in the PC industry come 2011/2012, something like when Core 2 was launched if not bigger than that. For starters, AMD's first genuinely new architecture since K8 will start to reach consumers in early 2011, undoubtedly followed by a counter-punch from Intel. It will be a make-or-break year to say the least. Fermi 2, ATI's successor to the 5xxx series (6xxx later this year is only a refresh)... now we just need some games that aren't console ports.
After all, 1.6 ghz Atom CPUs were found to be on par or worse than 900 mhz Celeron CPUs in most situations back when netbooks were the latest thing. The only thing that keeps Atoms in use is the fact that they cost practically nothing.
There will be a huge upset in the PC industry come 2011/2012, something like when Core 2 was launched if not bigger than that. For starters, AMD's first genuinely new architecture since K8 will start to reach consumers in early 2011, undoubtedly followed by a counter-punch from Intel. It will be a make-or-break year to say the least. Fermi 2, ATI's successor to the 5xxx series (6xxx later this year is only a refresh)... now we just need some games that aren't console ports.
Re: spring for android?
ARM isnt that bad, its got a nice instruction set, it avoids a huge swathe of nonsensical cruft present in x86. They're easier to design, and easier to make, and easier to maintain.
The problem is, ARM is currently being marketed at markets where low power consumption is key, and high performance isnt necessary, e.g. circuit boards acting as intermediaries, routers, smart phones, etc, as such the only other major factor is price, which they've pushed and pushed.
Its not that ARM can't do high performance, its that nobodies shown much interest in it until quite recently.
The problem is, ARM is currently being marketed at markets where low power consumption is key, and high performance isnt necessary, e.g. circuit boards acting as intermediaries, routers, smart phones, etc, as such the only other major factor is price, which they've pushed and pushed.
Its not that ARM can't do high performance, its that nobodies shown much interest in it until quite recently.
Re: spring for android?
AF wrote:ARM isnt that bad, its got a nice instruction set, it avoids a huge swathe of nonsensical cruft present in x86. They're easier to design, and easier to make, and easier to maintain.
The problem is, ARM is currently being marketed at markets where low power consumption is key, and high performance isnt necessary, e.g. circuit boards acting as intermediaries, routers, smart phones, etc, as such the only other major factor is price, which they've pushed and pushed.
Its not that ARM can't do high performance, its that nobodies shown much interest in it until quite recently.
With Apple wanting to buy arm
With ARM servers coming up as cheaper and faster per volume than Intel
With Google netbook claiming to implement dual-core 2.0Ghz ARM chipset
and many more.
Re: spring for android?
I understand that x86 is a bloated, outdated, inferior technology designed in another era, but I hate the idea of widespread adoption of anything else. I mean, unless there's a way to emulate x86 with reasonable speed, then screw it.
Re: spring for android?
Even the incremental attempt at leaving x86 that is x64?