Exactlyneddiedrow wrote:Forboding and I are just having a little fun, don't worry about it. They're labels - we both know labels really don't have any meaning that we don't generate for them ourselves.
Besides... He started it
Moderator: Moderators
It's very easily disputable, but I don't even need to argue it here. My top tax rates for the upper classes are still much lower than the European equivalents, and where else would the elite go? They don't feel safe in general without a nice cushion of people of their ethnicity around them - wealth leads to comfort, comfort leads to narrowness.Caydr wrote:The problem with the tax brackets suggested, as I learned from SimCity 4 ^^, is that it will drive away weathy and industry, thereby eliminating investors and jobs, killing the economy, driving you into a recession, and doing the opposite of what you intended.
As corrupt as it sounds, giving big corporations huge tax breaks is the best thing for the economy. It's indisputable.
Actually there is little difference between the two. Communism requires the state to have absolute power, just like Hitler really. But people can be fooled by the rhetoric of communism, particularly if they are poor and blame capitalism for their problems. An unscrupulous leader can use the promise of communism to seize power and establish a dictatorship.Snipawolf wrote:Ahh.. I dunno. I mean, it seems like an ideal set up..
Anyways isn't communism where people rule? Not leaders? Wouldn't mine be more that nazism thing with Hitler XD
trouble is, in their current state when people are given freedom half of them will make a grab for as much power as they can. you need a level playing field, and for everyone to want a level playing field.Jack wrote:Actually there is little difference between the two. Communism requires the state to have absolute power, just like Hitler really. But people can be fooled by the rhetoric of communism, particularly if they are poor and blame capitalism for their problems. An unscrupulous leader can use the promise of communism to seize power and establish a dictatorship.Snipawolf wrote:Ahh.. I dunno. I mean, it seems like an ideal set up..
Anyways isn't communism where people rule? Not leaders? Wouldn't mine be more that nazism thing with Hitler XD
IMHO, if you are in charge, the right thing to do is to create a legal framework that will ensure the continuing freedom of the people in your country. This is a bit like the U.S. constitution, but it's the constitution with security patches installed, to protect the people from any corrupt leaders that might get themselves elected in the future. But it might be more fun to oppress your enemies while living a life of A-list luxury in your massive palace...