Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
Moderator: Content Developer
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good ideaForboding Angel wrote:Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
then nobody will have even read access to it except ba devs. Also, private repos cost moneyForboding Angel wrote:You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: trac <-> github ?
???? See the bugtracker for the actual difficulties.is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea
No one has rolled their own anything, it's a vanilla trac install. Aside from the rather bizarre trend of people wanting to micro-manage someone else's project - using a private repository would hurt development and (if I understood them correctly) violate most of our own licenses.I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac... You do know that each user can have a private github repo
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
jamerlan wrote:is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good ideaForboding Angel wrote:Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
Replaced large image with link. (Silentwings).jamerlan wrote:then nobody will have even read access to it except ba devs. Also, private repos cost moneyForboding Angel wrote:You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
Every github user gets one free private repo.
That would be rolling your own trac -_-Silentwings wrote:No one has rolled their own anything, it's a vanilla trac install.
Last edited by Silentwings on 19 Aug 2015, 10:13, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Replaced large image with link
Reason: Replaced large image with link
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Link please? Could use this for a non-Spring project, https://github.com/pricing says otherwise.Every github user gets one free private repo.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
If you still have your student email you can get 5 free private repos
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
Very funny, I hope you're enjoying yourself
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
You can always use Bitbucket if you want free Git or Mercurial repositories. The main benefit of Github (social-collaborative features) are lost when using a private repository anyway.
PS: I'm pretty sure BA(R) is open source, not sure what you're talking about. And also, Github's Public repository doesn't mandate a license, especially not one for Art which is where BAR is a little bit different.
PS: I'm pretty sure BA(R) is open source, not sure what you're talking about. And also, Github's Public repository doesn't mandate a license, especially not one for Art which is where BAR is a little bit different.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
It's a 31k image, stop abusing your mod powers.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
Silentwings is moderator in this subforum, so it is fine, i've closed your report. i guess "large" references to the image dimensions (~600x630)Forboding Angel wrote:It's a 31k image, stop abusing your mod powers.
imo the image is argueable. (offtopic, possible breaks someones privacy, also the source is unknown / license unknown -> possible a license viloation when embedding here without asking the photographer)
(if someone responds to this, topic needs to be split again, its again very offtopic, also thats a reason to not use such images: threads go offtopic very fast with them)
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")
The issue isn't the image itself, it's that you're undoing mod actions.