Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Balanced Annihilation with remade Units

Moderator: Content Developer

Post Reply
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14603
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by Forboding Angel » 18 Aug 2015, 08:06

Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
0 x

User avatar
jamerlan
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 683
Joined: 20 Oct 2009, 13:04

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Post by jamerlan » 18 Aug 2015, 08:43

Forboding Angel wrote:Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea
0 x

User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14603
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Post by Forboding Angel » 18 Aug 2015, 09:12

You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
0 x

User avatar
jamerlan
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 683
Joined: 20 Oct 2009, 13:04

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Post by jamerlan » 18 Aug 2015, 09:58

Forboding Angel wrote:You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
then nobody will have even read access to it except ba devs. Also, private repos cost money
0 x

User avatar
Silentwings
Moderator
Posts: 3593
Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23

Re: trac <-> github ?

Post by Silentwings » 18 Aug 2015, 10:34

is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea
???? See the bugtracker for the actual difficulties.
I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac... You do know that each user can have a private github repo
No one has rolled their own anything, it's a vanilla trac install. Aside from the rather bizarre trend of people wanting to micro-manage someone else's project - using a private repository would hurt development and (if I understood them correctly) violate most of our own licenses.
0 x

User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14603
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Post by Forboding Angel » 19 Aug 2015, 04:18

jamerlan wrote:
Forboding Angel wrote:Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea
jamerlan wrote:
Forboding Angel wrote:You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
then nobody will have even read access to it except ba devs. Also, private repos cost money
Replaced large image with link. (Silentwings).

Every github user gets one free private repo.
Silentwings wrote:No one has rolled their own anything, it's a vanilla trac install.
That would be rolling your own trac -_-
Last edited by Silentwings on 19 Aug 2015, 10:13, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Replaced large image with link
0 x

User avatar
Silentwings
Moderator
Posts: 3593
Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Post by Silentwings » 19 Aug 2015, 09:13

Every github user gets one free private repo.
Link please? Could use this for a non-Spring project, https://github.com/pricing says otherwise.
0 x

User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5302
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by Jazcash » 19 Aug 2015, 09:25

If you still have your student email you can get 5 free private repos :P
0 x

User avatar
Silentwings
Moderator
Posts: 3593
Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by Silentwings » 19 Aug 2015, 09:28

Very funny, I hope you're enjoying yourself :wink:
0 x

gajop
Moderator
Posts: 3023
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 20:42

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by gajop » 19 Aug 2015, 09:33

You can always use Bitbucket if you want free Git or Mercurial repositories. The main benefit of Github (social-collaborative features) are lost when using a private repository anyway.
PS: I'm pretty sure BA(R) is open source, not sure what you're talking about. And also, Github's Public repository doesn't mandate a license, especially not one for Art which is where BAR is a little bit different.
0 x

User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14603
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by Forboding Angel » 19 Aug 2015, 09:46

It's a 31k image, stop abusing your mod powers.
0 x

abma
Spring Developer
Posts: 3556
Joined: 01 Jun 2009, 00:08

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by abma » 19 Aug 2015, 15:35

Forboding Angel wrote:It's a 31k image, stop abusing your mod powers.
Silentwings is moderator in this subforum, so it is fine, i've closed your report. i guess "large" references to the image dimensions (~600x630)

imo the image is argueable. (offtopic, possible breaks someones privacy, also the source is unknown / license unknown -> possible a license viloation when embedding here without asking the photographer)

(if someone responds to this, topic needs to be split again, its again very offtopic, also thats a reason to not use such images: threads go offtopic very fast with them)
0 x


gajop
Moderator
Posts: 3023
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 20:42

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Post by gajop » 19 Aug 2015, 22:14

The issue isn't the image itself, it's that you're undoing mod actions.
0 x

Post Reply

Return to “Balanced Annihilation Reloaded”