Page 3 of 7

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 02:27
by FLOZi
colorblind wrote:Here's my two cents:

Image

Flower in bloom -> spring, jumping person -> spring ("spring" Dutch for "to jump"). Tell me what you think.
Horrible, to be honest. Think hrmph's is best so far.

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 02:28
by PauloMorfeo
The 2 ones i liked the most are:
http://www.timblokdijk.nl/spring/logo/logobar.png
and
http://fileuniverse.com/images/springbannerblah.jpg
If any unit should be present, it should be the comander/comanders and nothing else.

I think i'm more inclined to
http://fileuniverse.com/images/springbannerblah.jpg
The other one looks too shinny it almost hurts my eyes, while this one is softer and it shows one comander, which is the icon of TA.

Also, the comander it shows is the core comander.
The original TA screenie showed the Arm commander and the Arm are indeed suposed to have won the war. This can be seen as the comeback of the Core. The Core, once again, battling the eternal (until someone wins it again) strugle.
Also, XTA seems to be Core oriented. While, in the old days, everyone played Arm in almost all maps, now, Core can be seen has having an advantage so it makes sense to show the Core comander as they are rising once again.
Lots of simbolism.

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 08:26
by Neuralize
You know, before the PHPBB BUG thing. We were having a logo war. However, as I mentioned before, the SYs are rather passive on the art front. They do what swedes do best?


Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

I didn't $59,200 artistic merit scholarship for nothing, y'know :P

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 10:52
by Min3mat
:shock: ! nice any would do but the SprinG one with a mex and a kbot casting a shadow from the rising sun!!! :shock: VERY nice!!!!! :-)

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 10:53
by colorblind
FLOZi wrote:Horrible, to be honest. Think hrmph's is best so far.

Constructive criticism! Just what I needed :P. It's a new logo, not a whole banner ...
And if I may be frank, the banners posted so far are butt-ugly. Why are you all trying to make them look like the one we have now? Wasn't that one ugly too?
I like Neuralize's first, second and sixth logo; but perhaps the latter two aren't well suited for a website: they're too big and detailed to make any smaller.

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 13:43
by AF
I think the travesty that was the logo thread be left in the past. And that this new thread doesnt turn into somethign similair. And it'd be appreciated if an SY told us if they didnt want this to save us wasting time as it was with the logo thread

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 17:49
by Buggi
Awwwwwee... We get to see the softer side of Tim...

Nice flowers man. ;)

And Neuro, man, I wanna buy those commanders... are they at the local toy store? :D :D :D

8)

Must have taken a HELL of a long time to get all the units rendered like that... :shock: I'm impressed.

-Buggi

..

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 18:41
by hrmph
Just had to say those packaged toy commanders are pure genius :)

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 20:04
by Neuralize
Thank you for your kind words. :)
You can get all the Spring renders here in obnoxiously large resolution.

Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 23:42
by RightField
Image
Image

hmm.

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 00:24
by Min3mat
ADORE the second one...it looks comfortable and stylish and not to big a filesize (me hopes) 8)

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 01:04
by Neuralize
Image

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 01:14
by Ace07
Min3mat wrote:ADORE the second one...it looks comfortable and stylish and not to big a filesize (me hopes) 8)
I like a lot of them in here....most of them are very good. Now we just need someone to put them at the top of the page....

*nudge*nudge*

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 09:45
by AF
I prefer neuralize & rightfelds latest ones with the screenshot backgrounds.

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 10:09
by Min3mat
i'm not liking neuralises latest one but all the others in the same style are sweet. how about a random one of the (three/four?) appearing as the logo ? 8)

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 10:35
by AF
Neuralizes latest one is spiffy with the way the logos done, its abstract.

Also, I tend to think the red version of the logo doesnt look that good compared to the white version.

Image

Though maybe not with that font, the white version though not 3d looking, is more manipulatable and fits all the guidelines I gave as being a good logo that'll fit anywhere.

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 14:20
by PauloMorfeo
Neuralize wrote:...
I didn't $59,200 artistic merit scholarship for nothing, y'know :P
Is that 59 thousand us dolars?

I also like alot this one:
Image
Because it looks very pretty, shows masses of units (which TA is all about) and has a nice lines ruining the perfectioness of the image.
However, it looks like a good one for the old TA and somewhat doesn't feels so right on the Spring engine, which is a more pretty and colourfull engine than the old TA one. (still extremely inspiring and indeed one of my favorites, till know, tied with one other)

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 17:09
by Ace07
PauloMorfeo wrote: Image
Because it looks very pretty, shows masses of units (which TA is all about) and has a nice lines ruining the perfectioness of the image.
However, it looks like a good one for the old TA and somewhat doesn't feels so right on the Spring engine, which is a more pretty and colourfull engine than the old TA one. (still extremely inspiring and indeed one of my favorites, till know, tied with one other)
Ya, that image is really good. Its simple, and it gets the job done I think....

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 17:17
by AF
Ok here's a comparison of my fav 2 put in perspective...
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

...

Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 18:45
by hrmph
I vote for any of them! I'd rather see the cats than the sperm anyday :D