add "censorship" / profanity files to github?

[PicassoCT]

împortant is that filtering is not seen as a act of powers that be to censor you
more of a guy having a longer leaver trying to make you look ridiculous by impotent rage

steam and origin are the same thing- but one is cool and one is not. Why? Cause if you flung shit at valve, it wouldnt stick - or even worser, could fly back at you.

[Silentwings]

@abma: Sounds fine to me.

[abma]

partly done + applied:
https://github.com/spring/uberserver/co ... b3e0363022

(watch your lang again!)

todo is https://github.com/spring/uberserver/issues/150

[gajop]

In short, I'm OK with the proposed changes, but ideally I'd do this:

1. store profanity list only on server, don't put it in the git repo

It's actually OK to put the profanity list on server, or note where the profanity list has been obtained from.
I certainly don't see an issue with it either way.

3. don't filter/change channel/battle/private messages at all

I actually wouldn't mind it if you did enable filtering but made it optional. Alternatively it wouldn't be a bad thing if lobby clients implemented it locally (and then it would be nice to have the profanity list).

[abma]

I actually wouldn't mind it if you did enable filtering but made it optional. Alternatively it wouldn't be a bad thing if lobby clients implemented it locally (and then it would be nice to have the profanity list).

making it optional imo this is sth. that makes server code bloat. also performance wise its pretty bad.