împortant is that filtering is not seen as a act of powers that be to censor you
more of a guy having a longer leaver trying to make you look ridiculous by impotent rage
steam and origin are the same thing- but one is cool and one is not. Why? Cause if you flung shit at valve, it wouldnt stick - or even worser, could fly back at you.
add "censorship" / profanity files to github?
Moderator: Moderators
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: add "censorship" / profanity files to github?
@abma: Sounds fine to me.
Re: add "censorship" / profanity files to github?
partly done + applied:
https://github.com/spring/uberserver/co ... b3e0363022
(watch your lang again!)
todo is https://github.com/spring/uberserver/issues/150
https://github.com/spring/uberserver/co ... b3e0363022
(watch your lang again!)
todo is https://github.com/spring/uberserver/issues/150
Re: add "censorship" / profanity files to github?
In short, I'm OK with the proposed changes, but ideally I'd do this:
I certainly don't see an issue with it either way.
It's actually OK to put the profanity list on server, or note where the profanity list has been obtained from.abma wrote:1. store profanity list only on server, don't put it in the git repo
I certainly don't see an issue with it either way.
I actually wouldn't mind it if you did enable filtering but made it optional. Alternatively it wouldn't be a bad thing if lobby clients implemented it locally (and then it would be nice to have the profanity list).abma wrote: 3. don't filter/change channel/battle/private messages at all
Re: add "censorship" / profanity files to github?
making it optional imo this is sth. that makes server code bloat. also performance wise its pretty bad.gajop wrote:I actually wouldn't mind it if you did enable filtering but made it optional. Alternatively it wouldn't be a bad thing if lobby clients implemented it locally (and then it would be nice to have the profanity list).