Sucky_Lord wrote:This really makes no sense:
[LOeT]Zinn wrote:There where guys constantly voting for DSD when it wasn't. On the other side there where people constantly voting for an other map ("any other map!") when there was DSD.
So you pushed the equilibrium well over to the DSD side by creating 2 DSD Only hosts? :S With such a small playerbase that forced those who wanted to play other maps to play DSD simply because there were very rarely any other games open.
Let me just get my point out to really explain what I think: Having a DSD Only host attracts players because its a good map and people are comfortable with it. The game gets around 4 players before other hosts start to fill up and, because the spring community is so small, everyone rushes to get into the fastest game.
The game finishes and players want to play another map, but are unable because the host forces them to continue playing DSD or leave. This is the real problem as I see it, and I simply dont understand what was wrong with the democratic system we had before, where people cast their vote, and the majority wins the map vote.
Of course im wasting my time here..
You are wasting MY time when you just keep standing on your point of view, keeping the exact same perspective, while the point itself got deconstructed.
Your arguments are just a mixture of disproved and invalid (nonsense or lies, you pick your poison).
Me for example can play non DSD whenever I want.
And by terrorizing I meant exactly the behavior Carpenter is showing right now. "OMFG, i hate DSD. Make a Tabula only host at least. Tabula is better." That is no nice behavior, rather some sullen mumbling. It's exactly the point for implementing features like ignore lists.
You guys are chat spamming while there is 1 Wide Pass v1 (I dislike that map/mod but I would never ask anyone to get rid of it), 1 Blindside, 1 Nuclear Winter, 1 Tropical and two DSD hosts - one of them with 11 other maps, but no one does want to play them atm.
If you would go in there and vote for something else you would have (if it did succeed, which i doubt) you would have rushed the lazy players in there (getting something to dring, toilet, etc.) This people would cry when they see that there is a non DSD map coming up. The worst guys would even quit. So the game would get voted for exit (2-4 minutes), DSD would get revoted (2-4 mins) and a new game would start (2-4 mins). I wonder why you did not get sick of
that procedure.
This "democracy" you are thinking about is simple chaos. Those who got their need fulfilled get lazy and forget voting. Others are fighting for a change and dumbfounding the first ones. And lastly everyone submits to the loudest, most insulting ones. Votes for kicks got started because people insisted on
their map - regularly, all the time.
On the other hand the DSD manics where constantly messing up every host with more than 10 players and voted for DSD. This has stopped since the DSD-hosts exist. People playing on maps other than DSD are 98% more likely to play on any good map other than DSD. I wonder why you want the old times back. Your outspoken needs and your demands do not match.
If you deny everything I am writing, I too see no further use in this discussion. I condemn your demand for Reeducation of free players.
And as I am finishing this post Sucky_Lord is joining DSD while there is a FFA on Blindside, one Tropical and one Wide Pass running. Are you serious or just trolling around?! Great fighters for freedom being followers of the masses...
When your next post once again consists of a single quoted paragraph and your "arguments" start to stay the same as those that do fill two threads by now, I will not read to the end.
(All metric relative values in this post are pure guessing)
