Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Moderator: Content Developer
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Priority targeting wouldnt have helped Dragon in that situation though.
- TheFatController
- Balanced Annihilation Developer
- Posts: 1177
- Joined: 10 Dec 2006, 18:46
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
If all AA targeted transports first then you could just send in a load of empty Seahooks with your bombers to tank the AA.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
True, and figters do much less dmg to transports than to bombers.TheFatController wrote:If all AA targeted transports first then you could just send in a load of empty Seahooks with your bombers to tank the AA.
Could anyone be kind enough to update http://modinfo.adune.nl/index.php?side=core&MOD=ba691 to new ver?
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Is there a way to make AA target loaded transports first?TheFatController wrote:If all AA targeted transports first then you could just send in a load of empty Seahooks with your bombers to tank the AA.
Even so, the dragonfly transport costs almost the same as a t2 bomber and has the same HP, so I'm not sure it's that degenerate a strategy. The seahook is a bit more expensive, although it does have a higher hp/cost ratio.
Regardless, the VTRANS targetting category doesn't include the dragonfly/seahook - it's only the t1 trans.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
I'm not sure that would be a good idea, because afaik there is no visual indicator of t2 trans being loaded or not, so how could the AA know?YokoZar wrote: Is there a way to make AA target loaded transports first?
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
You do realize that that wouldnt have helped in that situation at all?YokoZar wrote:1) T1 fighters should probably have transports in their priority target list. See http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=20429
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Fair enough, but perhaps the priority should still apply to the t1 trans. Would make combombing into AA slightly harder since sending a bunch of decoy transports wouldn't work quite as well.BaNa wrote:I'm not sure that would be a good idea, because afaik there is no visual indicator of t2 trans being loaded or not, so how could the AA know?YokoZar wrote: Is there a way to make AA target loaded transports first?
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Every form of AA should target bombers first, gunships second, transports third, since that's really the order of danger for your base.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
no transports is first... or, loaded ones.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
AA should prefer what it does bonus damage to. So fighters target bombers, flakkers target gunships.el_matarife wrote:Every form of AA should target bombers first, gunships second, transports third, since that's really the order of danger for your base.
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Bombers are still a more immediate threat than transports since you may have ground defenses or units that can handle the airdropped units. Bombers could blow up your base and AA is the only thing that can stop them.JohannesH wrote:no transports is first... or, loaded ones.
This is a good point, and I assume you mean whatever it does the most bonus damage by percent? That's as good a way as any to determine what the unit is designed to counter, I think.YokoZar wrote: AA should prefer what it does bonus damage to. So fighters target bombers, flakkers target gunships.
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
do geothermals need to cost so much E? as it is, you rarely see them in 1v1s even when the geovent is in a nearby, protected location
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Its more interesting when theres a significant drawback too, its not like a giant windmill but more like a big adv solar.1v0ry_k1ng wrote:do geothermals need to cost so much E? as it is, you rarely see them in 1v1s even when the geovent is in a nearby, protected location
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
In Supcom those geos are much more accessible in 1v1.
In SA i made them cost less and give less e proportionately.
They are still the most cost effective building but are accessible earlier.
In SA i made them cost less and give less e proportionately.
They are still the most cost effective building but are accessible earlier.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
is it just me, or do the playerlist and the ally resources from that (ingame) settings menu on the right not work properly? every time I try to close the playerslist, luaui crashes immedeately...
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 11:20
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Why was the Minimap Events widget removed? I miss it.
edit: downloaded it from springfiles, but still..
edit: downloaded it from springfiles, but still..
Last edited by HectorMeyer on 25 Sep 2009, 17:03, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
yah advplayer list died for me toobartvbl wrote:is it just me, or do the playerlist and the ally resources from that (ingame) settings menu on the right not work properly? every time I try to close the playerslist, luaui crashes immedeately...
- very_bad_soldier
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007, 01:10
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Yeah I had that too. Deleting my lua config (I know its a pain to reconfigure) fixed it.BaNa wrote:yah advplayer list died for me toobartvbl wrote:is it just me, or do the playerlist and the ally resources from that (ingame) settings menu on the right not work properly? every time I try to close the playerslist, luaui crashes immedeately...
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
doesnt a textfile saves the configures for each mod?
- very_bad_soldier
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007, 01:10
Re: Balanced Annihilation V7.01
Yes. I deleted \LuaUI\Config\BA.lua and widget_data.lua but I guess deleting BA.lua should be sufficient.