Page 3 of 3

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 07 Nov 2011, 06:59
by PicassoCT
as a member of the weight watchers, i protest against the implementation of temptation of donut maps. This will lead only to scale-depression like the cookie-currency did.

Srsly, all new version and suddenly this "I can demand it" spirit is back from the grave.

Very well then, i demand 72 maidens to delivered with spring, of virtuell true. And i want to see a force feedback blanket supported, so i can get massaged by the battle. OHHH YEAH, DSD thats the spot, thats the spot.

I also demand for a realistic astrophysical map representation, meaning, if you zoom out to far, you get realistic scaled planetary motion, loosing your map and game, while getting adrift in space.

I also demand the devs to be less sacarstic, i mean, when have we moddevs ever bashed someone, just for his unrealistic ideas? We must upkeep the freedom of squeek.

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 08 Nov 2011, 08:12
by CarRepairer
PicassoCT wrote:as a member of the weight watchers, i protest against the implementation of temptation of donut maps. This will lead only to scale-depression like the cookie-currency did.

Srsly, all new version and suddenly this "I can demand it" spirit is back from the grave.

Very well then, i demand 72 maidens to delivered with spring, of virtuell true. And i want to see a force feedback blanket supported, so i can get massaged by the battle. OHHH YEAH, DSD thats the spot, thats the spot.

I also demand for a realistic astrophysical map representation, meaning, if you zoom out to far, you get realistic scaled planetary motion, loosing your map and game, while getting adrift in space.

I also demand the devs to be less sacarstic, i mean, when have we moddevs ever bashed someone, just for his unrealistic ideas? We must upkeep the freedom of squeek.
lolled.

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 08 Nov 2011, 14:45
by AF
PicassoCT wrote:as a member of the weight watchers, i protest against the implementation of temptation of donut maps. This will lead only to scale-depression like the cookie-currency did.

Srsly, all new version and suddenly this "I can demand it" spirit is back from the grave.

Very well then, i demand 72 maidens to delivered with spring, of virtuell true. And i want to see a force feedback blanket supported, so i can get massaged by the battle. OHHH YEAH, DSD thats the spot, thats the spot.

I also demand for a realistic astrophysical map representation, meaning, if you zoom out to far, you get realistic scaled planetary motion, loosing your map and game, while getting adrift in space.

I also demand the devs to be less sacarstic, i mean, when have we moddevs ever bashed someone, just for his unrealistic ideas? We must upkeep the freedom of squeek.
The cookie currency is currently alive and well, and lodges a complaint of libel over the misleading claim of cookie induced obesity. All cookies are sacred artefacts that shall not be consumed. Cookiecide will be treated harshly.

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 08 Nov 2011, 16:33
by momfreeek
Rename the forum to "Feature Demands" then?

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 08 Nov 2011, 16:59
by smoth
not everyone makes demands.

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 08 Nov 2011, 17:50
by MidKnight
smoth wrote:not everyone makes demands.
I DEMAND THAT THOSE WHO DO NOT MAKE DEMANDS BEGIN DOING SO IMMEDIATELY.

I ALSO DEMAND THAT THE INFERIOR LETTERS OF THE LOWER CASTE BE ELIMINATED FROM OUR GLORIOUS COMMON LANGUAGE.

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 09 Nov 2011, 19:47
by PicassoCT
Everybody is talk, talk, talk but picasso delivers..

http://szyzyg.arm.ac.uk/~spm/neo_map.html

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 10 Nov 2011, 14:41
by Charadin
i think some moderator can lock and even trow all of this to garbage, it's no more a "request".

Re: Planetary, moon or asteroid map.

Posted: 10 Nov 2011, 14:52
by knorke
Charadin wrote:i think some moderator can lock and even trow all of this to garbage, it's no more a "request".
no no dude, say "demand!"