Moderator: Moderators
Model: Intel Pentium 4 w/ Hyper ThreadingMasure wrote: I also really wonder whats your cpu that runs 4.4Ghz
the multiplier is 17 259*17= 4403 MHz
what the hell are you babbling about?Masure wrote:Oh P4 prescott, I thought you we're talking about a true cpu.
You re definitively a fanboy and probably doesn't know that netburst architecture sucks.
Your 4.4Ghz overclock is great but is done by any true cpu running at 2.5Ghz
Take a look at the P4 965 XE (3.73Ghz) :
It's the same with all benchmarks you could find.
I took the first benchmark in a 20 pages article. But all the benchmarks say the same : 3dsmax, cinebench, mathematica, sciencemark, mp3enc (lame), oggenc (eac), divx/xvid (vdub), tmpegenc, winrar, farcry, fear, doom, ut, ...2.5 = 4.4... no.
In "specific scenarios" under "specific tasks" the 2.5 will equal or outshine the 4.4 under the newer technology abilities...
but, by no means is it equal speeds.
The tests you ran on sciencemark are biased.
MatBe.com doesn't sell anything, it just provide price comparison links next to articles just like toms do...That website SELLS computer parts, is it not coincidence that the most expensive parts are on the tops of all the lists?
Netburst sucks, you can clock it, it will be better but you can overclock A64 and Core2duo processors too...none of the overclockable parts are overclocked?
none of the OTHER important factors of a computer, I.E. the motherboard, are taken into consideration and DIFFERENT socket cpu's with require different motherboards are compared side by side, as if they are on equal platforms??
har.
We didn't discuss about springmark. It was off topic. Dont understand why you say my previous posts killed springmark. I think you re just teasing me cause we argued on other subjects.AF wrote:I think masure is doing a mighty fine job of killing off spring mark on his own lathan, just be secure in the knowledge that some peopl cant see the light when it blinds them.
Imagine Sping game is the classroom.neddiedrow wrote:The problem is that their is a form of lobby which discriminates and excludes people based upon whether or not they have conducted the test and scored high enough - numerous people who I've seen host stable games, up to 8v8 with spectators. That's the only problem I have with it which cannot be ignored.
LOLMasure wrote:Imagine Sping game is the classroom.
The teacher can teach at the slowest speed given by the slowest learning pupil. If there is a single retard, all the pupils are wasting their time.
Retarded people go in retarded schools. You say it's discriminating, I say you're hypocritical.
"The teacher can teach at the slowest speed given by the slowest learning pupil." > HypothesisPeet wrote:LOLMasure wrote:Imagine Sping game is the classroom.
The teacher can teach at the slowest speed given by the slowest learning pupil. If there is a single retard, all the pupils are wasting their time.
Retarded people go in retarded schools. You say it's discriminating, I say you're hypocritical.
K, I hereby award you one free "GTFO my internets", redeemable at any of our global locations. My father just published his masters thesis on inclusive education...perhaps you should pull your head out of your ass and put some sunscreen on that red neck of yours, and read it.
