Definition of a "pro" player. - Page 4

Definition of a "pro" player.

Please use this forum to set up matches and discuss played games.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
JohannesH
Posts: 1793
Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 12:43

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by JohannesH »

But who can rush nuke best
User avatar
triton
Lobby Moderator
Posts: 330
Joined: 18 Nov 2009, 14:27

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by triton »

pro doesnt means to be best at everything... in all team games people have different roles and different skillz.. its so obvious.
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4383
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Peet »

I propose speedmetal with a 30 minute grace period as the metric for determining which player is best.
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Jazcash »

triton wrote:pro doesnt means to be best at everything... in all team games people have different roles and different skillz.. its so obvious.
It's so obvious in fact it's not even relevant. We're discussing (Well we tried) what the definition of a "Pro Player" is. Rattling off all the players you think are good isn't anything to do with that. Therefore I propose this thread officially derailed!

<3 Peet.
User avatar
Carpenter
Posts: 216
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 16:07

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Carpenter »

Now it seems like I brought a new word to spring as some ppl said, pro. It replaced word "bro" in my vocabulary. The goal of the thread is finally reached, thanks fellow pros.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Gota »

Now i will never use it again.
XD
User avatar
Carpenter
Posts: 216
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 16:07

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Carpenter »

Gota wrote:Now i will never use it again.
XD
I doubt that. ;)
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Jazcash »

Carpenter wrote:
Gota wrote:Now i will never use it again.
XD
I doubt that. ;)
<3 your avatar <3
User avatar
Carpenter
Posts: 216
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 16:07

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Carpenter »

JAZCASH wrote: <3 your avatar <3
I knew you would love it.
User avatar
Argh
Posts: 10920
Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Argh »

That avatar is cute... yet creepy :twisted:
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Neddie »

d_b wrote:s44 is not a real game, you need a magnifying glass. Silly neddie.


If you beat me with pre alpha version of ants ur pro. Which is impossible.
Learn to zoom.
User avatar
Carpenter
Posts: 216
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 16:07

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Carpenter »

Here comes a good example how pro players beat nubs.
http://replays.adune.nl/?1987

First, bombastic is far away from pro level. The second thing is, HOW CAN MY 2 FAV PLAYERS OF SPRING LOSE THEIR COMMANDERS IN THE MIDDLE SO EASILY!?

Sorry for caps.
User avatar
Spawn_Retard
Posts: 1248
Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Spawn_Retard »

anyone who believed spring 1v1 skill is anywhere similar to team game skill has just got trolled.

you could be the best 1v1 player and be shit at team game.

Of course im the best of both worlds, so you guys better stfu and get in line before i spam scouts then flash the stumpies then win the whole game. Fuck the other 200 units the mod has.
User avatar
triton
Lobby Moderator
Posts: 330
Joined: 18 Nov 2009, 14:27

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by triton »

The second thing is, HOW CAN MY 2 FAV PLAYERS OF SPRING LOSE THEIR COMMANDERS IN THE MIDDLE SO EASILY!?
I am one of you're two favorite players of spring? nice :D

Yep we failed on that game, one of our greatest fail ^^, but its not so strange, sometimes when u play with good players you can be too confident and think : i can suck my allys will own them for me. I sometimes lose 1vs1 to nubs too, but who cares? ;)

In last tourney kixu and bomba lost 1vs1 versus bybyk (bybyk sometimes make good raid but he's far weaker than bomba and kixu)

shit happens ^^
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Gota »

Hmm if bybyk won maybe your assessment of his skill is just wrong?
could it be that it is you who is wrong as oppose to people by accident failing to fall in their assigned,by you,positions?
User avatar
triton
Lobby Moderator
Posts: 330
Joined: 18 Nov 2009, 14:27

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by triton »

lol i cant understand you're sentence basic, anyway i really think that kixu and bomba are FAR better than bybyk.

I like some things in bybyk playstyle thats whiy i offered him to join pink clan for training few month ago, but pinks rejected him cause he was ALWAYS starting air and making banshee, then MARS asked him to join them, they kicked him from their clan after few days, cause he was trying too much dumb move with air, after this I dont know but i think he's in spaceinvaders now.

He's a cool guy and sometimes he plays well, but he's far from being into "PRO" (best) players of spring.
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Jazcash »

"What's with the haters? :cry: "
User avatar
albator
Posts: 866
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 14:20

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by albator »

Carpenter wrote:Hmmh, yeah well true, 1on1 is the only way actually to compare players but it still doesnt make you "pro". I've seen a lot of players that have done well in 1on1 but not so well in team games. Good example is [MARS]AlbAtoR. He is imo one of the best team players in spring, but not that notable at 1on1. So basically if he was good at 1on1, he could be awesome.

So Spring needs a lot more those all around players who can find out some sort of solution in every situation during the game, I mean normally some newbie would just try to porc or give up, but players who can and will find out something unpredictable are the supermen next to god.
I accept the challenge ^^ I will play 1vs1 now

triton wrote:lol i cant understand you're sentence basic, anyway i really think that kixu and bomba are FAR better than bybyk.

I like some things in bybyk playstyle thats whiy i offered him to join pink clan for training few month ago, but pinks rejected him cause he was ALWAYS starting air and making banshee, then MARS asked him to join them, they kicked him from their clan after few days, cause he was trying too much dumb move with air, after this I dont know but i think he's in spaceinvaders now.

He's a cool guy and sometimes he plays well, but he's far from being into "PRO" (best) players of spring.

Not totally true. We kicked him because he did not wanted to use TS. We were thinking he could be good if he was listening advices we could provide him. But he was never able (or never wanted to ?) connect to the team speak. And since - according us ofc - his playing still was not solid enough on some basic point (eco optimisation, bp managment,...) we decided to kick him cause it seems he will never be able to progress fast enough withoiut TS.




About the topic. This topic looks like "old wise men" fighting to know if they are going to add a new word into the dictionnary. I dont think a lot of players care of that matter ^^

Do you think a glass of 1 liter filled with 0.5 Liter is :
-1 half empy ?
-2 half full ?
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Jazcash »

albator wrote: Do you think a glass of 1 liter filled with 0.5 Liter is :
-1 half empy ?
-2 half full ?
Can't it be both?
User avatar
Carpenter
Posts: 216
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 16:07

Re: Definition of a "pro" player.

Post by Carpenter »

albator wrote:
Carpenter wrote:Hmmh, yeah well true, 1on1 is the only way actually to compare players but it still doesnt make you "pro". I've seen a lot of players that have done well in 1on1 but not so well in team games. Good example is [MARS]AlbAtoR. He is imo one of the best team players in spring, but not that notable at 1on1. So basically if he was good at 1on1, he could be awesome.

So Spring needs a lot more those all around players who can find out some sort of solution in every situation during the game, I mean normally some newbie would just try to porc or give up, but players who can and will find out something unpredictable are the supermen next to god.
I accept the challenge ^^ I will play 1vs1 now
Anytime!
About the topic. This topic looks like "old wise men" fighting to know if they are going to add a new word into the dictionnary. I dont think a lot of players care of that matter ^^
We all do care about it. ;)
Post Reply

Return to “Ingame Community”