It does not make sense for unitsync to poison the well for anything that touches it as it is the entry point for so much.
There has been talk of this before. Thoughts?
Moderator: Moderators
I don't follow. I thought you could use (certain) open source licences with GPL. Example for the BSD one: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-lis ... odifiedBSD.hoijui wrote:and they want to add spring support but can not, because they are BSD licensed.
i am not sure whom you talk about here, but i guess it is dansan.Forboding Angel wrote:Hoijui, it was one of the engine devs who mentioned the merit of changing the unitsync license to LGPL that prompted this thread.
We (the engine developers, aka its biggest interest group) feel and have always felt that Spring gains far more than it loses from being GPL'ed.Forboding Angel wrote: GPL has been very detrimental to Spring in the past.
no sweetie, we don't love you that muchdanil_kalina wrote: Could you ( spring developers ) please release unitsync by LGPL license ?
YupLicho wrote:But otherwise I don't care and I don't think you can change GPL license once it was set (in an easy and "lega" way)