Do you support Bush? v2

SpikedHelmet · Post by **SpikedHelmet** » 14 Oct 2006, 06:28

To prove BlackLiger wrong, I have created this second poll.

(FYI: BlackLiger claims that in the previous poll, the fact that the "NO" option was above the "YES" option led to some sort of bias against Bush.)

Raign · Post by **Raign** » 14 Oct 2006, 06:35

No way in hell !

Zoombie · Post by **Zoombie** » 14 Oct 2006, 07:05

There's still not a 'indifferent' selection.

LathanStanley · Post by **LathanStanley** » 14 Oct 2006, 07:42

why do I even bother...

THIS IS A DAMN INTERNATIONAL BOARD! if US ONLY could vote on it, SUUUUUURE it'll be a "sign" or 14 year old videogame nerds...

urgh...

post it on something like http://www.ford-trucks.com or something like http://www.big-boards.com

both are probably the most populated messageboards on the net full of US members (excluding 4chan

which is just effin HUUUGE)

but yeah... try a poll in a respectable spot and we'll see what happens..

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 14 Oct 2006, 08:09

Respectable and all-American sadly do not go hand in hand on the internet, in my experience. Every forum I remain a member of is notably an international one - for good reason.

SpikedHelmet · Post by **SpikedHelmet** » 14 Oct 2006, 10:18

Just proving a point that the placement of the options has no bearing on the outcome. I don't care about more excuses.

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 14 Oct 2006, 12:16

"Hells yeah!"

I voted yes again by the way, due to the same reasons as before.

BvDorp · Post by **BvDorp** » 14 Oct 2006, 12:52

It's just too easy to disaprove with Bush. You never have to make the decisions he had to, just saying he could've done better will make u vote 'no' here.

And there you are, not knowing what ur talking about, sitting in your lazy chair, being ignorant, and most of all, not participating in how to make things better.

That, my friends, sux.

pintle · Post by **pintle** » 14 Oct 2006, 13:58

Bush may have had to make some difficult choices, but he didnt have to allow the level of civillian casualties in Iraq that he did. I have numerous reasons for opposing his political agenda, but #1 on my list is he is a genocidal fast assist and repair kbot face

BvDorp · Post by **BvDorp** » 14 Oct 2006, 14:11

Err.. IMO the 'choice' for casualties, if there was actually one to be made, was with the other side, aka. muslims etc.

After all, it's mostly them which do the civilian killing

BlackLiger · Post by **BlackLiger** » 14 Oct 2006, 14:18

Doing something like this INTENTIONALLY negates the concept I posted, because you're conciously putting YES first. Spiked, you know nothing about the psychology of these things.

rattle · Post by **rattle** » 14 Oct 2006, 14:48

People who know what they are going to vote aren't influenced by the order, only the clueless ones.

Decimator · Post by **Decimator** » 14 Oct 2006, 14:50

Well, considering we can't vote for Bush anymore, I don't think that applies.

Guessmyname · Post by **Guessmyname** » 14 Oct 2006, 14:50

BlackLiger wrote:Doing something like this INTENTIONALLY negates the concept I posted, because you're conciously putting YES first. Spiked, you know nothing about the psychology of these things.

Does it really matter?

SwiftSpear · Post by **SwiftSpear** » 14 Oct 2006, 15:14

No duplicate posts. Polls are useless anyways.

Spring RTS Engine

Do you support Bush? v2

Do you support Bush?

Do you support Bush? v2