TA:Spring run with GC2? - Page 3

TA:Spring run with GC2?

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

DeathHawk wrote:i am not talking any sides here but i dont believe this guy would come on here and lie for no reason so ill see if what he says is true or not
If you find that they are indeed named the same thing the easy check to see if they are the same file format is to change the file name to .7zip and unzip it with winrar. If it works and comes out something coherant then we may very well be using a similar format to GC. I seriously doubt it's so similar that the two engines can run eachother's content though.
DLS_Gishank1
Posts: 48
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:18

Post by DLS_Gishank1 »

I don't want to actually have people hating me. SO lets say i'm wrong and forget this incase i am wrong?
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

They are marked as "demo files" which means .sdf. I don't think they'd be unzippable and I don't think Spring would do anything but crash if you tried to make it run those.
DLS_Gishank1
Posts: 48
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:18

Post by DLS_Gishank1 »

OK, i got it wrong. And don't take the piss out of my intelligence because my IQ is 179, also, everyones wrong sometimes.
SJ
Posts: 618
Joined: 13 Aug 2004, 17:13

Post by SJ »

For some reason "Stor Data Fil" and "Spring Demo File" isnt quite interoperable :)
User avatar
ee
Posts: 62
Joined: 08 Jun 2006, 14:17

Post by ee »

lawck.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

SJ wrote:For some reason "Stor Data Fil" and "Spring Demo File" isnt quite interoperable :)
There you go, same filetag used, but they don't mean the same thing.
User avatar
DeathHawk
Posts: 278
Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 02:02

Post by DeathHawk »

Guys It was all a hoax so lets forget this eva took place !!!!!! No more fights....
User avatar
clericvash
Posts: 1394
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05

Post by clericvash »

DLS_Gishank1 wrote:OK, i got it wrong. And don't take the piss out of my intelligence because my IQ is 179, also, everyones wrong sometimes.
Someone with that high an IQ qould never make a mistake like that, with an IQ like that...you are probably the smartest person on the forum...yeah right

Mod should lock this? Stupid...
User avatar
Cheesecan
Posts: 1571
Joined: 07 Feb 2005, 21:30

Post by Cheesecan »

DLS_Gishank1 wrote:OK, i got it wrong. And don't take the piss out of my intelligence because my IQ is 179, also, everyones wrong sometimes.
Hm, where did you take that test, online or at a legitimate place such as Mensa or the army?
Yeah, people are going to have a hard time believing that, as it places you into the 1 promille society. This would make you an equal to some of the biggest geniuses of our time such as Goethe, Newton, Shakespeare and Descartes.

/me beats head against brick.

Were that true then you wouldn't be sitting here getting lectured on why file endings != equal file format. You'd also have no problem taking a simple screenshot to prove your wild claims. Furthermore you would understand that we would all be very skeptical to this, and make sure you had proof prior to posting.
My freudian estimate is that you're an attention-seeking individual with an average IQ.
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Post by AF »

Dont bost about having things that are immensly unlikely and astronomically huge, such as over the top figures for IQ/bandwidth etc Your just destroying what very little credibility you have left, and without that you'll be eaten alive by the vultures here.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

Don't blame him, there are widely inaccurate IQ tests available on the internet. I've had some tell me 130 while others went up to 160.
User avatar
Comp1337
Posts: 2434
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 17:32

Post by Comp1337 »

Indeed. I had 220 in one test.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

Gees, you guys are assholes.

"OMG, HE SAID SOMETHING INACURATE, BAN HIM!"

You're worse then the old guard TAers we used to have chasing away the newbies.
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Post by AF »

Its not that eh was innacurate, its that he exxagerated the innaccuracies to impossible proprtions.

oh it's 10MB not 100MB throughput may be fine but oh its 10Mb throughtput not 4 petabytes is different ebcause its not a mistake it's taking the p*ss.
User avatar
Dr.InfernO
Posts: 223
Joined: 18 Nov 2005, 13:55

Post by Dr.InfernO »

Image
User avatar
Guessmyname
Posts: 3301
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 21:07

Post by Guessmyname »

Comp1337 wrote:Indeed. I had 220 in one test.
(according to ze internets) my IQ ranges from 14 to somewhere around 250.

(I took about six tests in a day because of boredom. And I did act stupid on purpose to get an IQ of 14 but hey...)
User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Post by Pxtl »

worst. thread. ever.
hawkki
Posts: 222
Joined: 01 Jan 2006, 19:47

Post by hawkki »

Ya, that was pretty much the most uncool thing ever -moderator
User avatar
Cheesecan
Posts: 1571
Joined: 07 Feb 2005, 21:30

Post by Cheesecan »

I think somebody is going to assume a new identity on these boards. :roll:
Locked

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”