Panda wrote:Gota wrote:You dont get it do you...i find these forums to be a bigger and bigger waste of time....the problem of a pedophile is not that he isa rapist its that he is atttracted to kids..
A pedophile is a rapist, because having sex with, or raping, kids is wrong. Having sex with kids is wrong because it's a kid and is very immature, physically and mentally.
No, a paedophile is someone sexually attracted to kids. It not until they act on the impulse that they become a rapist.
Panda wrote:Gota wrote:rape is just his resort cause he cant stop himself after x amount of time..thats what im guessing..as i said imagine u couldnt satisfy yuor sexua lneedz ever...youd feel frustrated beleive me...
He can stop himself if he trains himself to not be attracted to children the same way a priest would train himself to not be attracted to women or a nun not to be attracted to men. He could focus on God or something that does not involve children, work at doing this all the time, and go to therapy to try and gain a more realistic view of how children are immature. Unfortunately, I doubt that a lot of pedophiles do this and genetic predispositions towards certain behaviors is just that, a predisposition. It isn't so strong that they have to be a pedophile.
That is the single most stupid thing I have heard ever. I'll bet that priests are the most sexually frustrated people on the planet. baring the fact that you can bet they all fuck each other.
Panda wrote:Also, homosexuality used to encouraged in Rome among soldiers when they went off to war.
That would have been so hot.
Gota wrote:I was talking about the dsire itslef.
IOsnt it too mcu to aks a person to overcome his sexual drive and when not being able to judge him?could you me or any other guy not have sex with women for our entire lives?maybe but we dont know that..its a very hard question i think...
Ok, try it yourself. Pick the opposite of your sexuality and force yourself to be it. I've tried it, it was sole destroying. Ignorant fundamentalist Christians do a serious amount of psychological damage to themselves by following this argument.
I imagine paedophilia is the same. While I would argue its from a different process, it is for all intents a and purposes sexuality.
They tried to cure sex criminals once, by having the person associate their particular sexual deviancy with pain. They subjected the criminals to electric shock therapy while showing them pictures they would find erotic. The program was realised to be a failure when the researchers realised that their subjects were putting their hands in the toaster to get off.
Gota wrote:So question is are they to be blamed for not being able to overcome their sexual drive or are they to be looked at as mentaliiy ill and thus not responsible for their actions.. raping a child is a horrible thing that plays on our emotions but when we talk of justice and science we cannot lean on our emotional response.
Are we to be blamed for fearing the idea so much that we force paedophile to keep their dirty secret to themselves, to struggle against their desires alone?
I like where you are going. in general. But I cant put a consistent argument together either way. The whole situation is an awful moral and practical dilemma.