I'll sum this up in two words: "Papers please!"LathanStanley wrote:My idea of legal action to incorporate that will halt illegal immigration.
(hopefully, peacefully, since it'd be a binding law, and posted)
Any material transaction incurring a monatary value of >1,000 $ USD requires a valid photo ID of american citizenship, or the legal documentation to reside within the US borders. Failure to present said documentation, voids the transaction. Presentation of faulty identification is a class A Felony, impersonating a US citizen as an illegal. (invasion of territoy) and punishable by fine and imprisionment. On repeat offenses, punishable by death.
and yes, I'm Republican.
granted it would be like enforcing the legal sale of alcohol, there will always be those that cheat the system, it would give us more reason to hire more law enforcement and police more properties thoroughly...
and no, I'm not a nazi, just sick of the crap in this country we shouldn't have to deal with. (full spanish commericals on AMERICAN TV with no translation) thats ruidiclious.
Legal action to take vs. illegals...
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Legal action to take vs. illegals...
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Heh, you obviously haven't been reading about what goes on here...Sleksa wrote:would you like to show me the part of the law where it says that protecting human lives is a criminal offense?
The socialists simply don't care. It's damn near impossible to understand, but it's the truth. In their eyes by using any force at all, regardless of what happened, they consider you to be at fault. In their eyes, the II "Didn't know any better". It's horribly frustrating.
It's fucked up, and makes 0 sense whatsoever, but thats quite honestly the way it is.
murder is illegal. No matter the reason, you go to court for killing anyone. At least if you are a normal citizen, the criminals in the hood can hide out but normal people like myself would be prosecuted. No when you go to court the point the prosecution will make is that you went over the line and had no real reason to kill the person in self defense. If they can convince a jury of your "peers" that you did it without justification they will give you the sentence for murder.Sleksa wrote: would you like to show me the part of the law where it says that protecting human lives is a criminal offense?
They have to put all murders to trial rather then just dismissing it. That is the problem, those of us who are doing things proper always get boned by those who break the law. Court cases are expensive and prosecutors live for putting you in jail and if there is a media stink brought on by one of the more asinine groups of bleeding hearts you will be a pariah.
in finland that is called "excessive use of force in self-defence situation",
and if you actually kill the other guy you have to have fucking reasonable justification for it to walk out free
(IE he raped your family in front of you and then shot you in the legs and put the gun on your head but you somehow managed to kill him would get you the walk out of the jail free card)
and if you mean that killing someone in a self-defence process should be legal, think how people could exploit this to kill the illegal immigrants or other people for that matter
and if you actually kill the other guy you have to have fucking reasonable justification for it to walk out free
(IE he raped your family in front of you and then shot you in the legs and put the gun on your head but you somehow managed to kill him would get you the walk out of the jail free card)
and if you mean that killing someone in a self-defence process should be legal, think how people could exploit this to kill the illegal immigrants or other people for that matter
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
True, but sad considering that once the Drive By Media caught wind of you killing an II, you would be immediately found guilty by the drive by's. Regardless of what actually happened. And when the media pounces on a private citizen with average means, it pretty much is guaranteed to destroy you.smoth wrote:yeah, that is why we have trials for all kills.
It always has to be given a hard look. Now to be honest, I love panda, I do not ever want to have to kill someone to protect her but if it came between losing her and defending her I have to.
Even if you were exonorated, the trial would be a media circus frenzy. They would be looking to make an example of you.
Sad but true :/
Re: Legal action to take vs. illegals...
I'm tempted to call Godwin on this part of the thread. Asking for movement papers is not inherently Nazism. Just about every country does it at entry / exit, which is the whole problem - people coming in without being validated.KDR_11k wrote:I'll sum this up in wo words: "Papers please!"
Re: Legal action to take vs. illegals...
Forb wanted paper validation for transactions above 1000$. That could easily get a progressively lower threshold.Erom wrote:I'm tempted to call Godwin on this part of the thread. Asking for movement papers is not inherently Nazism. Just about every country does it at entry / exit, which is the whole problem - people coming in without being validated.KDR_11k wrote:I'll sum this up in wo words: "Papers please!"
Smoth, when you have reason to believe the other person is a serious threat to your life you are permitted to use lethal force in self defense. From what I heard it's better to shoot to kill in the US, just wounding him leaves you open to lawsuits so make sure you finish him, if he was threatening you and perhaps was even armed you're allowed to do that.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Legal action to take vs. illegals...
No I didn't KDR, I think you mean lathan. It is not a bad idea though.KDR_11k wrote:Forb wanted paper validation for transactions above 1000$. That could easily get a progressively lower threshold.Erom wrote:I'm tempted to call Godwin on this part of the thread. Asking for movement papers is not inherently Nazism. Just about every country does it at entry / exit, which is the whole problem - people coming in without being validated.KDR_11k wrote:I'll sum this up in wo words: "Papers please!"
Smoth, when you have reason to believe the other person is a serious threat to your life you are permitted to use lethal force in self defense. From what I heard it's better to shoot to kill in the US, just wounding him leaves you open to lawsuits so make sure you finish him, if he was threatening you and perhaps was even armed you're allowed to do that.
Shooting to kill... Meh, they are both just as bad. If you wound him, the bleeding hearts will crucify you. If you kill him, the media and every bleeding heart in america will crucify you.
Either way, you WILL lose, even if you are found "Not Guilty" of a crime.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
A sobering dose of the truth.
Read them, if only a few...
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/te ... ctims.html
Read them, if only a few...
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/te ... ctims.html
* I'll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here. "I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs." "I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking." "Hey, wait a minute, there's one guy holding out both puppets!" "Shut up! Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control. Here's Love Connection. Watch this and get fat and stupid. By the way, keep drinking beer, you fucking morons."
Bill hicks for the rescue
Bill hicks for the rescue
yea thats such a good idea..............................................................................manored wrote:Illegal imigrants exist cause USA rarely accepts legal imigration... and why that? I mean, population is power, just look to China...
Actual, I think USA should merge with Mexico, I mean, Mexico is tottaly dependent from USA and half of his population wants to go there...
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Heh. If they can't be assed to make a wall, they should just print up limited immigration IDs. Make all the illegal immigrants legal immigrants and thus subject to American law.
A huge part of the illegal immigration mess is that legal immigration is a frigging massive hassle and the vast majority who apply are denied.
A huge part of the illegal immigration mess is that legal immigration is a frigging massive hassle and the vast majority who apply are denied.
sleksa do you have an album bu adam freeland by any chance? its called now and then, there are some top notch tunes on it and one 0f them (we want your soul) has an extract from what you just quotedSleksa wrote:* I'll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here. "I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs." "I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking." "Hey, wait a minute, there's one guy holding out both puppets!" "Shut up! Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control. Here's Love Connection. Watch this and get fat and stupid. By the way, keep drinking beer, you fucking morons."
Bill hicks for the rescue
"Shut up! Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control. Here's American Gladiators. Heres 56 channels of it. Watch these (something) wearing retards bang their fucking skulls together!" and a bit more but i cba to type more ^^