Just because it's annoying to cancel a whole building queue manually because you realise you're stalling.
I suggest that an on/off status be added to all factories. On=build. Off=stop what you're currently producing, and wait to be turned on to begin the next item in the build queue.
Comments?
Suggestion: on/offing a factory starts/pauses production
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Suggestion: on/offing a factory starts/pauses production
Great idea =)Gabba wrote:I suggest that an on/off status be added to all factories. On=build. Off=stop what you're currently producing, and wait to be turned on to begin the next item in the build queue.
- PauloMorfeo
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: 15 Dec 2004, 20:53
Re: Suggestion: on/offing a factory starts/pauses production
Not only that, if we cancel, we lose what was beeing built, which could be a 2/3 finished Goliath... It's a good idea to use the "repeat orders" button for that.Gabba wrote:Suggestion: on/offing a factory starts/pauses production
Just because it's annoying to cancel ... building queue manually ...
Although .. not having that makes us have to be more economically wise. Adding that feature can take away some economical strategy from the game.
«Don't start to build a Goliath if you don't have the resources for it and won't want to nano-stall later»!
Thinking better, maybe it's better not having that, even though my 1st reaction was «it's a good idea».
Re: Suggestion: on/offing a factory starts/pauses production
its a very good point of view , it calls for better resource managementPauloMorfeo wrote:Not only that, if we cancel, we lose what was beeing built, which could be a 2/3 finished Goliath... It's a good idea to use the "repeat orders" button for that.Gabba wrote:Suggestion: on/offing a factory starts/pauses production
Just because it's annoying to cancel ... building queue manually ...
Although .. not having that makes us have to be more economically wise. Adding that feature can take away some economical strategy from the game.
«Don't start to build a Goliath if you don't have the resources for it and won't want to nano-stall later»!
Thinking better, maybe it's better not having that, even though my 1st reaction was «it's a good idea».