Google Code To Close
Moderator: Moderators
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: Google Code To Close
It's now about 1 week until googlecode goes read only. Anyone left to move out?
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: Google Code To Close
k, updated its wiki links.
From https://springrts.com/wiki/Gamedev:Publ ... nown_Repos, only XTA and SpringTanks are still using Google Code. Presumably XTA will move somewhere - is SpringTanks actively developed or should it be archived?FLOZi wrote:Anything here: https://springrts.com/wiki/Gamedev:PublicRepos that is not already on github should probably be cloned.
Re: Google Code To Close
As written here ( https://github.com/spring-archive/sprin ... t/issues/1 ) and here ( https://github.com/spring-archive/springtanks/issues/1 ) I do not want my stuff in this repo and still want it removed.
Someone assigned these repos to my github account: now it looks like I had put these things because the original google-code name has been replaced with the github account.
Forum rules say:
"We protect the content rights of the content artists and producers in our community first, and third parties second. You can be banned for stealing other's work here if it's reported to us."
It has been reported to you, again.
Similiar with "springtutorialgame" ( https://github.com/spring-archive/sprin ... d/issues/3 ) but being a 'tutorial' it is obviously public domain or something like that. But removing the note that the project is mothballed ( https://springrts.com/mediawiki/index.p ... ldid=30288 ) is the worst way to handle it because currently indeed nobody is maintaining it. Why do you even edit the wiki-page of a project that you have nothing to do with?
Someone assigned these repos to my github account: now it looks like I had put these things because the original google-code name has been replaced with the github account.
Forum rules say:
"We protect the content rights of the content artists and producers in our community first, and third parties second. You can be banned for stealing other's work here if it's reported to us."
It has been reported to you, again.
Similiar with "springtutorialgame" ( https://github.com/spring-archive/sprin ... d/issues/3 ) but being a 'tutorial' it is obviously public domain or something like that. But removing the note that the project is mothballed ( https://springrts.com/mediawiki/index.p ... ldid=30288 ) is the worst way to handle it because currently indeed nobody is maintaining it. Why do you even edit the wiki-page of a project that you have nothing to do with?
Re: Google Code To Close
locked topic, as all projects where archived / moved to an other location.