I am not going to moderate the page every day for idiot posts. I can check fro time to time but some anonymous guy posting random shit to the site DOES NOT warrant anything but deletion. I have no way to reach that individual and odds are they probably didn't check their post that often. Registered users can "watch" a page for news, media and file posts. They can be pmed and get an email when pmed. So him posting as a guest means he is not able to be reached. Hence the deletion.knorke wrote:Deleting the comment that asked a year ago if the project is still active does not really fix anything: just hides some symptons. You were of course not supposed to contact some anonymous guest from a year ago. Just maintain the site so that such questions do not get raised.
I already contacted an admin about a few issues, once I hear back from him I will also request he delete that odd link. this isn't about plopping a spring profile on random pages. This engine profile for the NTH TIME has to be created so projects can list this as their engine.knorke wrote:I did, I wrote it is here on this list: http://www.moddb.com/engines/spring/games ( http://www.moddb.com/games/my-spring-map-pack )old map pack: Link me and I will delete it if I can.
But tbh if anyone really cared about that page or anyone maintained it someone would have noticed such things earlier, not after 3 years.
If contacting admins is needed, then do that. If that is too much hassle or does not work, then it is another example why we should not plop spring profiles on every other site.
There is no archive functionality to the site. That isn't how the site works, I get your desired feature but it doesn't mean that is how the site works or ever will work. Moddb prefers for a graveyard appearance rather than an archive. Until they allow us to "archive" we can only ever post a "this project is dead" post and leave it for history. I prefer it that way. Like you said, any other policy results in "what project is worth" issue.knorke wrote:You write "the page exists to have a central link for all projects using the engine."Even still, what is the problem with having older projects listed?
I think if almost only old dysfunctional projects are listed it goes against that idea:
Instead of the claimed "all projects" it really is "a few old projects."
Maybe deleting old games is not needed, it would open doors for "what project is worthy to be listed" policy, would suck too.
Still:
I do not see what is wrong with a note that says that more stuff can be found on springrts.com and that the list is incomplete?
If you want then leave the old entries as archive or whatever, - but make sure it looks like an archive and not a graveyard; and that life continues in another place.
I can edit the page to say whatever I want it to. I can even do some theming to the text area like I did for the grts page. I can always make a "come here for more info" post. did that on the grts page before I altered it to note that the project is dead.