Spring RTS Engine

I'd say reduce the build and load time is all it needs. This keeps the 'risk and fun' factor in, where you have to send out some cons suicidally to get the thing built, but it also makes it useful.

in all seriousness; i kind of have to sympathize a bit with those car chavs... britain is a police state these days you've got millions of CC cameras that originally started around football stadiums but ended up spreading everywhere; "anti-terrorism" acts that allow police to randomly sto...

I cant get enough!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_Q3AhPaZBY

Ok me and aether used some tac nukes today in different games. They're pathetic. They dont even kill a t1 kbot lab in 1 hit, and it takes 6 for a com?! Its stupid, you can claim they're OP all you like but there's a fantastic reason as to why nobody uses them.

Zoom in on the action at normal speed, then zoom out to the whole map and speed it up until the next bit of action.. and so on..

cant wait to hear how is making units bad. boo :( Christ you dont ever shut up do you!? Every time your arguments are debunked and quashed you just ignore the rebuttal and throw more absurd, senseless words into the discussion. I didnt answer that question/statement simply because the grammar is so...

I'm saying you can't actually kill the MMs unless the enemy builds them on the front line..

I've said all I have to say on the matter, hope it does get a buff!

I've played spring for 6 years gj at anti stopping tactical. Just proves how little theyre used. also, what do u mean 'effectively' ? to rape whole base with 1 rocket? its good for crippling enemy buildpower, t2 metalmakers. conclusion - spend ur resources on units. Effectively = To do enough damag...

I've played spring for 6 years and have never seen a tactical nuke used effectively, not even enough to warrant 1/4 of its price. If anyone has any replays to suggest otherwise, I'm all ears! The thing kills a few T1 units per shot, which come every minute or so as the reload time is so appallingly ...

Theyre a glorified Juno that can be stoppped by an anti nuke and has limited range.. wait, what? im confused... Im pretty sure the tactical nukes are stopped like normal nukes by an anti. Anyway go on, troll this thread like usual, im interested to see what you can find to troll about such a simple...

Aether is right, nobody with any sense builds them simply because they're utterly void of use. Theyre a glorified Juno that can be stoppped by an anti nuke and has limited range..

Gonna have to say i dont like the look of the tarmac, but the models themselves are nothing short of godly!

clearly kixu is top core player, llamadeus can fuck his llamas elsewhere

Its not about arm v core, its about balancing it without putting in loads of petty, shitty little nuisances that most people dont know about.

A bit like whackamole, where they have more moles than we have hammers

Time for us all to unite and DDOS http://www.coachoutletshopping.com/ as a way of saying "fuck off spamming our site!"?

I just feel, with the added weight of the water in just one area.. and the large population.. My fear is that it could cause Australia to.. tip over, and, uh, and capsize..

+1 panda +1 trademark

I dont get it, she's some hyper girl that isnt funny and isnt particularly pretty. Though she did give us one thing, a very funny encylopedia dramatica article.

You shouldnt be fixing the balance by making annoying functions that not many newbs know about like "this LLT can fire over THIS solar, but that LLT definitely cant fire over THAT solar". Its just tedious, give core a new kbot unit or increase leveler sight?

I'd just like to see something like this implemented because atm the base setout is getting very samey.. You could always try building a different base :wink: But how? Its always like 4/3 solar or 8/6 winds and a veh lab or kbot lab. Occasionally if i'm feeling particularly audacious i throw in an ...