Spring RTS Engine

yep, one of the first lines: + export 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=2' Just saw it. Gaah. EDIT: Found it, issue with idiot sitting between the ch...

when grepping through spring's source i can't find any reference of BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION. is your buildscript setting/adding it as compile flag? can you provide the full output of the compile log? where does "-DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=2" come from? Will adding add_definitions(-DBOOST...

Hello all, I'm the Fedora spring maintainer. I'm trying to get 98 built and tested. While building spring I'm getting the following errors: [ 47%] Building CXX object tools/unitsync/CMakeFiles/unitsync.dir/__/__/rts/System/FileSystem/RapidHandler.cpp.o cd /home/gilboa/work/redhat/BUILD/spring_98.0/t...

abma wrote:yes, please! (+thanks!)

Done [1].

- Gilboa
[1] http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=4415

Short followup: springlobby 195 seems to working just fine w/ the patched version pr-download I've released w/ spring 96, so Fedora users will finally be able to use the latest version of springlobby (as well as spring itself). Beyond that, I'm facing an a CMake issue when trying to get spring built...

As the upstream developer/maintainer, do you want me to replace pr-downloader@96 w/ pr-downloader@trunk and stop cherry picking fixes or continue trying to get pr-downloader@96 working? yes, please. this would simplify things. also the core engine doesn't depend on pr-downloader, so this should wor...

this should fix this problem: https://github.com/spring/pr-downloader/commit/2343599d886eb7a85465c5374ce0eab1db8171b2 Gaah. head seemed to differ greatly from _96. @96 the relevant FileSystem.cpp code looks like this: for (unsigned int i=2; i<tmp.size(); i++) { char c=tmp.at(i); #ifdef WIN32 if ((i...

does current master branch work for you? As I'm packaging spring for Fedora I rather, as much as possible, keep to 96 + patches. (Unless 97 is immanent) this should fix it: https://github.com/springlobby/springlobby/commit/20e041abd87e164d3b982e2a2bee008425a1e16e God I hate github. I can only see i...

just for the curious, does it compile/work now? Hello, Managed to get everything building and playing together (a couple of hours ago). Springlobby does manage to download maps, but fails to download games: The console error is: [Error] /builddir/build/BUILD/springlobby-0.188/src/downloader/lib/src...

i don't see libpr-7z.so in this output. Actually, re-reading the output I posted, I see that you link against libpr-7z.a and not .so - so the symbols should be there. Guess it some weird issue in the springlobby build. If I didn't mention it before, thanks for taking the time to answer my questions...

no, springlobby doesn't require this lib to be shared. if it does its a different bug, too. other "libs" are static as well. for example https://github.com/spring/pr-downloader/blob/master/src/lib/bencode/CMakeLists.txt (also cmakes keyword would be SHARED, DYNAMIC doesn't exist. afaik SH...

missing "STATIC" keyword in https://github.com/spring/pr-downloader/blob/master/src/lib/7z/CMakeLists.txt thanks for reporting, i've fixed it: https://github.com/spring/pr-downloader/commit/935ea5530cef3ccf61035511735835aee810e843 Springlobby requires a dynamic library version of libpr-7z...

@gilboa: i've fixed this bug in pr-downloader, for 97.0 this should be fixed. if somehow easily possible you can update pr-downloader to build spring, else i suggest to disable to compile pr-downloader for 96.0. I've disabled pr-downloader in 95 but I require it in-order to update springlobby. I'll...

@gilboa: i've fixed this bug in pr-downloader, for 97.0 this should be fixed. if somehow easily possible you can update pr-downloader to build spring, else i suggest to disable to compile pr-downloader for 96.0. I've disabled pr-downloader in 95 but I require it in-order to update springlobby. I'll...

Hello all, I maintain spring under Fedora and trying to release spring 96. I'm currently facing a weird issue, trying to get pr_download built. I know Fedora DSO is a bitch to satisfy (I carry a number of DSO patches that I never bothered to push upstream as I doubt it'll interest other distros) - b...

Yes, pygccxml is a build time dependency and yes, it should be possible to integrate it, at least temporarily. This wouldn't even clutter the engine repository since the bindings are already a submodule: https://github.com/spring/pyunitsync I won't be able to check out the feasibility of this for a...

As the binding author I'm not aware of anything user visible that uses them. Before I begin, thanks for taking the time to answer my barrage of questions :) Obvious question 2: As far as I understand, this is build time dependency, right? (In case it hasn't been done) Will it be possible to simply ...

Well, it is optional, as in if it's not present the only thing that will happen is the python unitsync bindings not getting build. Other than replacing the bindings generator, which is built on pybindgen, there's nothing to avoid the pygccxml dependency. I'm quite surprised it's not in fedora tbh, ...

I ask all Package maintainers to add gccxml,python-pygccxml (or equivalents) to the build dependencies if possible so the unitsync python bindings get build. Hi, Any way to avoid this dependency? pygccxml is not a part of Fedora, and I greatly doubt that I'll get an OK to include yet another static...

84 is being pushed as a Fedora update.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates ... 4.0-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates ... 4.0-1.fc16

Please test and raise the karma / send bug reports.

- Gilboa