A nice idea knorke and looks good.
Couple of points:
- when editing templates you have to save page (not preview) to get the changes to propagate (As can be seen from my epic spam of recent changes)
- I kinda disagree with "Links to non-existent pages are bad. Avoid unless you plan to add them" as IMO they are (ideally) a good way to keep track of what pages need to be added (via http://springrts.com/wiki/Special:WantedPages), regardless of whether or not anyone has immediate plans to do so - I certainly agree that 'skeletons' should be avoided at all costs.
Flozi 17:44, 22 February 2012 (CET)
atm the wantedPages is cluttered with 148 entries ala "Nuke-slinging matches" and thus not usefull. Could be cleaned up though.
wrt "skeletons" I was not sure. A page that is just the structuring like
without content in between is not usefull.
But eg Maps:SpringMapEdit basically has no content but a link, though in this case it is ok.
Knorke 14:19, 23 February 2012 (CET)☺
RE: clutter; Hence 'ideally'. Many of them are caused by http://springrts.com/wiki/Spring:CurrentSiteMap which I'm not sure if we shouldn't just scrap /start from scratch anyway. What's the ETA on BA-related pages migrating?
Also another minor point - summaries for talk page edits?
Flozi 18:38, 23 February 2012 (CET)