Page 1 of 3

#xta channel Op list

Posted: 02 Aug 2010, 18:22
by AF
I've wiped the list clean, and added the following to the list as a temporary measure:
[17:17:39] <ChanServ> AF: Channel #xta info: Anti-spam protection is off. Founder is <AF>, 3 registered operators are <BrainDamage>, <[Evo]ForbodingAngel>, <[CoW]HermuldSuuri>.
Of course this will not suffice in the long run, and I have some in mind who should be on that list, though they're not online at the moment so i cant op them ( unsure of their primary account ).

So who should have operator status, and what is there username? I would like to avoid putting peop;e on the list who have sever moderator status as they already have those powers.

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 02 Aug 2010, 18:24
by babbles
[RoX]Babbles?

and I think shift wants it on [CoX]Shift

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 02 Aug 2010, 18:25
by AF
[RoX]Babbles has been added

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 03 Aug 2010, 23:12
by scifi
Hi Af well im fairly online these days, i played xta very often, in fact this forum acount is relatively new.

So i can check the channel very often, in a daily basis.

Anyways if you dont know who iam, ask hermuld, shift babbles, basic e.t.c...., forbodin angel (dunno if he remenbers me )

anyways add this acount if you want ofc [Ar]Scifi

Ar is the project im in so its an acount i use most

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 03 Aug 2010, 23:15
by babbles
dunno who that guy is

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 03 Aug 2010, 23:31
by scifi
babbles wrote:dunno who that guy is
lol :mrgreen:

do as you like :wink:

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 03 Aug 2010, 23:42
by 1v0ry_k1ng
mee

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 03 Aug 2010, 23:51
by AF
Post lobby account names, I cant give chanserv vague indications, it demands precise lobby usernames!

( does anybody else have comment on scifi? Babbles against, any other takers? )

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 03 Aug 2010, 23:52
by scifi
[Ar]Scifi

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 04 Aug 2010, 14:11
by pintle
When did AF hijack XTA? :P

<-- only person who ever organises any tourneys ever.


I don't see any reason why the op list needed changing in the first place, and object to having to justify to you why I should get it back.

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 04 Aug 2010, 17:16
by Gota
Maybe AF wants to dev XTA?

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 04 Aug 2010, 20:02
by Neddie
Wait, since when has AF had control of the channel? I know he wasn't/isn't the founder.

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 04 Aug 2010, 21:29
by babbles
he has been as long as I've been here

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 04 Aug 2010, 22:16
by manolo_
put an other cow - is hermuld already one? if not i vote for him

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 05 Aug 2010, 03:55
by AF
Ive been the founder for years, heck I hosted the website =p

Pintle, I dont really need it justifying, if the community agrees then you get added ( post your lobby username )

I wiped the list so that we wouldnt have ye olde people who have died since or forgotten about XTA on there. Who knows their accounts may get stolen, or they may be on newer accounts. It also removes the illusion of moderation when the people with powers are never present to exercise them.

Just say your lobby username and if nobody objects you get added. Nice and simple.

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 05 Aug 2010, 14:34
by pintle
If you dont know my lobby username you don't play XTA enough to claim this role...

[RoX]pintle

But then you listed all the people you removed from op before you did it right? right....

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 05 Aug 2010, 15:42
by babbles
pintle wrote:If you dont know my lobby username you don't play XTA enough to claim this role...

Yeah, he plays so little XTA, he doesn't know who doesn't play it!

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 05 Aug 2010, 15:44
by Gota
The real leet XTA players DONT play XTA!

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 05 Aug 2010, 16:29
by AF
It's called procedure

Re: #xta channel Op list

Posted: 05 Aug 2010, 17:49
by lurker
Arbitrary useless procedure? If someone can't connect 'pintle' with '[RoX]pintle' their objection is probably not going to hold any weight whatsoever.