Yes ofc they do. I meant to say "deny" instead of "permit".FLOZi wrote:Debian specifically DO require included software to be commercially available.very_bad_soldier wrote:Seriously, what is goofy about that? How could they include software that permits commercial use? Maybe I do misinterpret that but I consider that to be very reasonable.
BAR repo moving + content license
Moderator: Content Developer
- very_bad_soldier
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007, 01:10
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Mr Bob and pyra have transferred all licenses to me.
Petah, I dont like git, and i think github also only allows open source.
The model source files will also get uploaded into the /etc/artwork folder.
Thank you so much for the modinfo, PM sent.
Petah, I dont like git, and i think github also only allows open source.
The model source files will also get uploaded into the /etc/artwork folder.
Thank you so much for the modinfo, PM sent.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Beherith:
- Github has an SVN backend layer, you don't need a git client to use github, tortoiseSVN will work too
- You can have an svn repo sync automatically with a git repo, just look at the Wordpress repo on github, it's never more than 10 minutes out of sync with their Core SVN repo
- The only precondition to licensing github invokes, is that the source is readable since the free repositories are open/public, but ofcourse this does not apply to private repositories. I know many people who use Github for commercial private activities and do not use the front facing public parts
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Thanks AF, but we already have a working svn/trac set up for BA, I just moved BA into a branch of that.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Behe, they allow custom licensing. You can use whatever license you want with google code.Beherith wrote:The BAR art content is now under CC BY NC ND 3.0 license. Please ask me if you wish to use any content in the mod.
Also, I'm moving the project off googlecode as they only allow CC BY SA licenses for content. Stay tuned for more
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Is this project still progressing?
- FireStorm_
- Posts: 666
- Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 16:09
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Yes , (almost) every day.
I'm currently not sure where Beherith is the last few days, project leader for all intents and purposes, but I personally (among a few others) am still busy making new models. Apart from that lots of people work on and develop many different aspects of the project.
Check the progression here
I'm currently not sure where Beherith is the last few days, project leader for all intents and purposes, but I personally (among a few others) am still busy making new models. Apart from that lots of people work on and develop many different aspects of the project.
Check the progression here
- very_bad_soldier
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007, 01:10
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Is all the stuff hosted exclusively on Behe's home PC? Maybe it should be hosted on a more open platform to reduce the risk of the "bus factor" then.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
The problem with that is it's not very friendly I can't tell what is for BA and what is for BAR.FireStorm_ wrote:Yes , (almost) every day.
I'm currently not sure where Beherith is the last few days, project leader for all intents and purposes, but I personally (among a few others) am still busy making new models. Apart from that lots of people work on and develop many different aspects of the project.
Check the progression here
Looks like it gets a fair amount of spam on it as well.
Man I wish you guys used github so much more use friendly.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Personally I prefer git and github, but it's not that hard to track what's new in BAR: http://imolarpg.dyndns.org/trac/balates ... anches/BARliamdawe wrote: The problem with that is it's not very friendly I can't tell what is for BA and what is for BAR.
Looks like it gets a fair amount of spam on it as well.
Man I wish you guys used github so much more use friendly.
Besides, there's no reason any developer should give timely reports to mere users. You aren't paying and dev time is usually best spent actually deving :)
BA(R) probably lacks developers (as most Spring projects do, save for perhaps ZK), so one can't really demand that from them.
- FireStorm_
- Posts: 666
- Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 16:09
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Behe was working on fixing thatliamdawe wrote: The problem with that is it's not very friendly I can't tell what is for BA and what is for BAR.
I strongly believe that was a direct result of me linking to the pageLooks like it gets a fair amount of spam on it as well.
I agree with gajop about the limits of this small community.
(I think that also answers the "bus factor". Project to small, and some peoples role to big, to consider that.)
But even so, I see a finish line for BAR, and last time I checked Behe saw it too . It would surprise me if (some form of) completion wasn't reached before the end of the year. I plan to be done with my share long before.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Same, working on my share a little bit every week depending on how busy I am with work or feeling like working on some other things (nice to keep everything fresh). Really I'm not far away at all. BA:R is going to be the bee's cheese.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
And how much fifa you are playing
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
not my fault, it's holding me down and keeping me there
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
server with repo/bugtracker seems down
(rapid <-> svn sync complains about server not reachable)
(rapid <-> svn sync complains about server not reachable)
- Silentwings
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: 25 Oct 2008, 00:23
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
http://imolarpg.dyndns.org/trac/balatest/ responds fine for me - is that what you were looking for? (Maybe it was just temporarily down earlier.)
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
sorry was doing maintenance.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
down again for (didn't count) >18hours?! (i hope this info is useful)
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
I confirm http://imolarpg.dyndns.org/trac/balatest/ is not available.
Re: BAR repo moving + content license
Thank you for reporting, i just noticed it too. Unfortunately im away till 26th for xmas and cant reach that far to hit the reset button. Sorry