A Tournament!
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 31 May 2005, 18:34
Sound as a pound
Lol maybe gus but not if im not informed before hand
Gpox jusy beat me 3 or 4 times consecutivly in 1v1's! its those damn core rushing units the zippers that arm has no decent counter for that got me i almost had a good force at one point but he arrived 30 seconds to early for two sentinels to come online and i lost. Goodluck with him!
Gpox jusy beat me 3 or 4 times consecutivly in 1v1's! its those damn core rushing units the zippers that arm has no decent counter for that got me i almost had a good force at one point but he arrived 30 seconds to early for two sentinels to come online and i lost. Goodluck with him!
Hey whenever this damn thing starts someone email me or IM me on AIM
AIM: WeaZ8289
email: Weaz8289@yahoo.com
AIM: WeaZ8289
email: Weaz8289@yahoo.com
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Re: Sound as a pound
2 or more missle towers is the hard counter to zippers...EnlightenedOne wrote:Lol maybe gus but not if im not informed before hand
Gpox jusy beat me 3 or 4 times consecutivly in 1v1's! its those damn core rushing units the zippers that arm has no decent counter for that got me i almost had a good force at one point but he arrived 30 seconds to early for two sentinels to come online and i lost. Goodluck with him!
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Jethro suck at killing zippers, they will get killed on a ratio of like 2 to 1, plus they cost more and have a higher build time then MT, and they monoplize the Kbot lab's time which is a major factor in the early game. Rocket Kbots work well, but they suck against air as fighters and gunships tend to dodge the slower moving, poor turnrate projectiles, and they also suffer from the same monoplization issue. Watch SJ or any of the best XTA players in replays, you will always see some MT.Min3mat wrote:yeah 3 preferably and u really need those 'MT' to be units so u can still expand
Was thinking of having 1 spectator at every game.. to watch rules being followed (no rules!), and.. dunno..
but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.
Be sure to rate it and comment it (and save it) before uploading.
naming convention could have the name of the group(color), the the round (er.. 1st round is this one?) and.. version :D, map and players?..
TOUR_Blue_1stR_EnligthenedOne_MOnG
suggestions?
but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.
Be sure to rate it and comment it (and save it) before uploading.
naming convention could have the name of the group(color), the the round (er.. 1st round is this one?) and.. version :D, map and players?..
TOUR_Blue_1stR_EnligthenedOne_MOnG
suggestions?
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 31 May 2005, 18:34
Im around
Its setting itself up and in the past 120 hours i have had 16 hours sleep so bare with me i will probably have it timed by the end of tommorow :) but i got abit busy this week
- PauloMorfeo
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: 15 Dec 2004, 20:53
Having a spectator can cause suspicions. I've been acused before of having «a system» with my mates when spectating one of my PT mates. Anyway, not only because of suspicions, it is indeed possible to «cheat» through a spectator.mongus wrote:Was thinking of having 1 spectator at every game.. to
...
but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.
...
naming convention ...
suggestions?
About uploading them, i was already thinking that it would be «mandatory».
My sugestion:
Host uploads it (to avoid duplication of files with people making mistakes as to whom should upload it)
Naming convention:
TournamentName.Date.Round.SectionColour.PlayerNumVsPlayerNum
Ex:
IT.5-11-2005.R1.Red.1Vs2
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
A system like ventrillo?PauloMorfeo wrote:Having a spectator can cause suspicions. I've been acused before of having «a system» with my mates when spectating one of my PT mates. Anyway, not only because of suspicions, it is indeed possible to «cheat» through a spectator.mongus wrote:Was thinking of having 1 spectator at every game.. to
...
but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.
...
naming convention ...
suggestions?
About uploading them, i was already thinking that it would be «mandatory».
My sugestion:
Host uploads it (to avoid duplication of files with people making mistakes as to whom should upload it)
Naming convention:
TournamentName.Date.Round.SectionColour.PlayerNumVsPlayerNum
Ex:
IT.5-11-2005.R1.Red.1Vs2